Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38141144›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2024

Technical requirements and devices available for long-term hemodialysis in children-mind the gap!

Bruno Ranchin, Claus Peter Schmitt, Bradley A Warady, Hiroshi Hataya, Joanne Jones, Rowena Lalji, Christoph Licht, Melodie Mosca, Lynsey Stronach, Enrico Vidal and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Medical device regulation and dialysis practice-impact on patients, doctors and manufacturers.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Core Tenets of Central Venous Access in Children.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bruno RanchinPediatric Nephrology Unit, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France. bruno.ranchin@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9073-4662
Claus Peter SchmittPediatric Nephrology, Center for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bradley A WaradyDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Hiroshi HatayaDepartment of Nephrology, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Fuchu, Japan.
Joanne JonesQueensland Children's Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Rowena LaljiCentre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Christoph LichtDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Melodie MoscaPediatric Nephrology Unit, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Lynsey StronachUniversity College London Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Enrico VidalPediatric Nephrology Unit, Department for Woman and Child's Health, University-Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Johan Vande WalleDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Rukshana ShroffUniversity College London Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children requiring long-term kidney replacement therapy are a "rare disease" cohort. While the basic technical requirements for hemodialysis (HD) are similar in children and adults, key aspects of the child's cardiovascular anatomy and hemodynamic specifications must be considered. In this article, we describe the technical requirements for long-term HD therapy for children and the devices that are currently available around the world. We highlight the characteristics and major technical shortcomings of permanent central venous catheters, dialyzers, dialysis machines, and software available to clinicians who care for children. We show that currently available HD machines are not equipped with appropriately small circuits and sensitive control mechanisms to perform safe and effective HD in the youngest patients. Manufacturers limit their liability, and health regulatory agencies permit the use of devices, only in children according to the manufacturers' pre-specified weight limitations. Although registries show that 6-23% of children starting long-term HD weigh less than 15 kg, currently, there is only one long-term HD device that is cleared for use in children weighing 10 to 15 kg and none is available and labelled for use in children weighing less than 10 kg anywhere in the world. Thus, many children are being treated "off-label" and are subject to interventions delivered by medical devices that lack pediatric safety and efficacy data. Moreover, recent improvements in dialysis technology offered to adult patients are denied to most children. We, in turn, advocate for concerted action by pediatric nephrologists, industry, and health regulatory agencies to increase the development of dedicated HD machines and equipment for children.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisCentral Venous CathetersChildEquipment DesignHumansKidney Failure, ChronicCentral venous lineChildrenDeviceHemodialysis (HD)HemodialyzerUltrafiltration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.