ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024
Investigation on the accuracy of field widths and the quantitative relationship with energy variations for dynamic jaws helical tomotherapy.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of manufacturer integrated quality control for helical radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Investigation on the accuracy of field widths and the quantitative relationship with energy variations for dynamic jaws helical tomotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeTomoEDGE is an advanced technology for TomoTherapy treatment delivery by introducing a sliding-window dynamic jaw motion. The front and back jaws move independently at the start and end of a target volume along the longitudinal couch direction to reduce the undesired dose to the normal tissues. The accuracy of field width is essential to treatment delivery in this regard. The purpose of this work was to analyze the performance of dynamic jaws on helical tomotherapy and investigate the relationship with energy variation.
methodsThe Tomotherapy-Quality-Assurance (TQA) Dynamic Field Width procedure was performed monthly across three tomotherapy machines. All field widths were analyzed, especially the FWHM of the 10 mm field width. Field width measurements were compared with the ratio of Percentage Depth Dose at 20 and 10 cm to render the value of correlation. Changes in beam FWHM and energy were further discussed. Two-year data were collected for this purpose.
resultsOn average, measured field widths in each unit agreed within 1% tolerance recommendation stated. The average absolute difference between reference and measured FWs in each unit was approximately 0.07 mm. An increase of 1.5% in the FW of the 10 mm nominal beam width was correlated with a 1% increase in PDD
conclusionsA positive correlation between nominal 10 mm FW and PDD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.