Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38140330›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

The SHED Index: A Validation Study to Assess Sustainable HEalthy Diets in Portugal.

Margarida Liz Martins, Sigal Tepper, Bebiana Marques, Sandra Abreu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Margarida Liz MartinsCoimbra Health School (ESTeSC), Polytechnic University of Coimbra, 3045-093 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6870-3632
Sigal TepperDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee 1220800, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3885-117X
Bebiana MarquesFaculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5778-5828
Sandra AbreuResearch Centre in Physical Activity, Health, and Leisure (CIAFEL), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6722-1575
Universidade do Porto · PTTel Hai Academic College · ILUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to adapt and validate the Sustainable HEalthy Diet (SHED) Index for the Portuguese adult population, which was developed to assess sustainable and healthy eating patterns. Data were collected using a web-based questionnaire administered through interviews with 347 individuals aged between 18 and 65 years old. The SHED Index evaluates 30 items, allowing for the assessment and scoring of sustainable and healthy eating patterns. The higher the SHED Index score, the more sustainable and healthier the diet. A semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire was used to assess the participants' dietary intake. The criterion validity was examined by testing the relationship between the SHED Index score and adherence to the Mediterranean Diet. Reproducibility was assessed by determining agreement and reliability with test-retest. Construct validity was confirmed based on established criteria. A higher SHED Index score was associated with moderate to high adherence to the Mediterranean diet, while it was inversely related to the proportion of animal-sourced foods in the overall food intake (r = -0.281,

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyDiet, MediterraneanAdolescentAdultAgedDietHumansMiddle AgedPortugalReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultdiet indexesfood sustainabilityhealthy eatingsustainable nutritionvalidity

Identifiers

PMID38140330
PMCPMC10745297
OpenAlexW4389617181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.