Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38140313›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Addressing the Gap of Nutrition in Medical Education: Experiences and Expectations of Medical Students and Residents in France and the United States.

Solenn Thircuir, Nancy N Chen, Kristine A Madsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Lifestyle Medicine Interest Group (LMIG) Events Analysis.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Lifestyle Medicine in Medical Education: Maximizing Impact.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Solenn ThircuirESA Business School, Beirut B.P. 113-7318, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0003-3840-0424
Nancy N ChenDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Kristine A MadsenBerkeley School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94710-7360, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1880-5363

Funding

France Berkeley Fund Award N°28
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinct pedagogical approaches within medical curricula in France and in the U.S. reflect a growing recognition of the importance of nutrition to address major public health challenges. However, recent generations of medical students have expressed mixed opinions regarding nutrition education. What pedagogical approach may improve nutrition education? Despite different medical systems, students from both France and the U.S. share similar concerns and expectations, that nutrition knowledge must be embedded in the curriculum and must be engaging. Hands-on, system-based, epistemological, and multidisciplinary approaches need better articulation to forge a robust medical curriculum. In the rapidly changing contexts of medicine and public awareness, social science research may facilitate recommendations for improved nutrition education.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalNutritional SciencesStudents, MedicalCurriculumHumansMotivationNutritional StatusUnited Statesculinary medicinemedical curriculummedical trainingnutrition education

Identifiers

PMID38140313
PMCPMC10745340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.