Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38140243›Full record

ReviewVaccines2023

Attitudes towards Receiving Monkeypox Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mostafa Hossam-Eldin Moawad, Amira Mohamed Taha, Dang Nguyen, Mohammed Ali, Yasmine Adel Mohammed, Wesam Abd El-Tawab Moawad, Esraa Hamouda, D Katterine Bonilla-Aldana, Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mostafa Hossam-Eldin MoawadClinical Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt.
Amira Mohamed TahaFaculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum 63514, Egypt.
Dang NguyenMassachusetts General Hospital, Corrigan Minehan Heart Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Mohammed AliFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt.
Yasmine Adel MohammedFaculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71524, Egypt.
Wesam Abd El-Tawab MoawadFaculty of Pharmacy (Girls), Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt.
Esraa HamoudaFaculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia 32511, Egypt.
D Katterine Bonilla-AldanaResearch Unit, Universidad Continental, Huancayo 15311, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-9412-2556
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Master Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima 15097, Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-9773-2192

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe public's attitude towards Mpox vaccination is a critical factor in the success of immunisation programmes. Understanding the factors contributing to vaccine acceptance or hesitancy is critical for developing effective health communication strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to bring together evidence from observational studies on attitudes towards Mpox vaccination, including willingness and rejection.

methodsFrom this review's inception until June 2023, a comprehensive search was conducted across four major electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCO. The inclusion criteria included studies investigating public attitudes towards Mpox vaccination, as defined by acceptance and willingness to be vaccinated versus rejection and unwillingness.

resultsThirty studies met the inclusion criteria among the screened literature. An analysis of 27 studies involving 81,792 participants revealed that 45,926 (56.14%) were willing to receive the Mpox vaccination. In contrast, ten studies involving 7448 participants revealed that 2156 people (28.94%) were unwilling to receive the Mpox vaccination. Females were less willing to receive the vaccine than males, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.43-0.86). Furthermore, homosexuals were found to be more willing than heterosexuals, with an OR of 1.44 (95% CI, 1.14-1.80).

conclusionVaccination is emerging as a critical strategy for preventing Mpox infection and fostering herd immunity against potential outbreaks. Improving public awareness and acceptance of vaccination is critical to avoiding a situation similar to the COVID-19 pandemic. Targeted educational and outreach programmes could explain the benefits of vaccination, bridging the information gap and encouraging a proactive public health approach to emerging infectious diseases.

Indexed as

acceptancehesitancymeta-analysismonkeypoxMpoxvaccinewillingness

Identifiers

PMID38140243
PMCPMC10747893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.