ReviewVaccines2023
A Systematic Review of Vaccination Guidance for Humanitarian Responses.
Review in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vaccination in Forcibly Displaced, Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Factors Associated with Childhood Vaccination in Sub-Saharan African Countries Experiencing Armed Conflicts: A Scoping Review.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Article
- Complementary role of humanitarian civil society organisations in bridging gaps in immunisation programming in conflict and crisis-affected settings: the REACH Project experience.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Understanding Ukraine's immunization supply chain resilience in the face of war: a mixed-method study.Conflict and health · 2026Article
- Vaccination gaps in decentralized emergency response: understanding immunization barriers among volunteer firefighters. A cross-sectional mixed methods study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Effects of hydro-meteorological and geological disasters on vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks and routine immunisation amongst children: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Health conditions of older adults in complex humanitarian settings in low- and middle-income countries: a retrospective analysis of 2019-2025 data from Médecins Sans Frontières-supported inpatient departments.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Global emergency medicine: A scoping review of the literature from 2023.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Article
- Between war and pestilence: the impact of armed conflicts on vaccination efforts: a review of literature.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Special Issue: "Vaccination and Global Health".Vaccines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delivering vaccines in humanitarian response requires rigourous and continuous analysis of evidence. This systematic review mapped the normative landscape of vaccination guidance on vaccine-preventable diseases in crisis-affected settings. Guidance published between 2000 and 2022 was searched for, in English and French, on websites of humanitarian actors, Google, and Bing. Peer-reviewed database searches were performed in Global Health and Embase. Reference lists of all included documents were screened. We disseminated an online survey to professionals working in vaccination delivery in humanitarian contexts. There was a total of 48 eligible guidance documents, including technical guidance (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.