Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38139735›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Empowering Participatory Research in Urban Health: Wearable Biometric and Environmental Sensors for Activity Recognition.

Rok Novak, Johanna Amalia Robinson, Tjaša Kanduč, Dimosthenis Sarigiannis, Sašo Džeroski, David Kocman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rok NovakDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8393-9595
Johanna Amalia RobinsonDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-0641-6309
Tjaša KandučDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-2466-3485
Dimosthenis SarigiannisEnvironmental Engineering Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Sašo DžeroskiEcotechnologies Programme, Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-2363-712X
David KocmanDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-6297-2823

Funding

European Commission 690105Slovenian Research Agency P1-0143Slovenian Research Agency P2-0103Slovenian Research Agency Young Researchers Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participatory exposure research, which tracks behaviour and assesses exposure to stressors like air pollution, traditionally relies on time-activity diaries. This study introduces a novel approach, employing machine learning (ML) to empower laypersons in human activity recognition (HAR), aiming to reduce dependence on manual recording by leveraging data from wearable sensors. Recognising complex activities such as smoking and cooking presents unique challenges due to specific environmental conditions. In this research, we combined wearable environment/ambient and wrist-worn activity/biometric sensors for complex activity recognition in an urban stressor exposure study, measuring parameters like particulate matter concentrations, temperature, and humidity. Two groups, Group H (88 individuals) and Group M (18 individuals), wore the devices and manually logged their activities hourly and minutely, respectively. Prioritising accessibility and inclusivity, we selected three classification algorithms: k-nearest neighbours (IBk), decision trees (J48), and random forests (RF), based on: (1) proven efficacy in existing literature, (2) understandability and transparency for laypersons, (3) availability on user-friendly platforms like WEKA, and (4) efficiency on basic devices such as office laptops or smartphones. Accuracy improved with finer temporal resolution and detailed activity categories. However, when compared to other published human activity recognition research, our accuracy rates, particularly for less complex activities, were not as competitive. Misclassifications were higher for vague activities (resting, playing), while well-defined activities (smoking, cooking, running) had few errors. Including environmental sensor data increased accuracy for all activities, especially playing, smoking, and running. Future work should consider exploring other explainable algorithms available on diverse tools and platforms. Our findings underscore ML's potential in exposure studies, emphasising its adaptability and significance for laypersons while also highlighting areas for improvement.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesBiometryCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansPower, PsychologicalUrban Healthactivity recognitionlow-cost sensorsmachine learningparticipatory researchparticulate matterwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID38139735
PMCPMC10747712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.