ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Validation of the Short Physical Performance Battery via Plantar Pressure Analysis Using Commercial Smart Insoles.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06722768 (Identifying Gait Changes From a Cerebrospinal Fluid Tap Test Using a Smart Insole in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Identifying Gait Changes From a Cerebrospinal Fluid Tap Test Using a Smart Insole in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insole-Derived Plantar Pressure Variability Reveals Dual-Task Gait Differences in Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2026Article
- Cross-sectional study comparing smart insoles and manual methods for short physical performance battery in hip fracture patients.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Serial Assessment of Gait Changes After Interventions Using Smart Insole in a Patient With iNPH: A Proof-of-Concept Case Report.Brain & NeuroRehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This cross-sectional study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital's rehabilitation clinic, aimed to validate Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) results obtained through plantar pressure analysis using commercial smart insoles (SPPB-SI) and to compare these results to manually acquired results by an experienced examiner (SPPB-M). This study included 40 independent-walking inpatients and outpatients aged 50 or older. SPPB-SI and SPPB-M were administered concurrently, with the smart insoles providing plantar pressure data that were converted into time-pressure curves. Two interpreters assessed the curves, determining component completion times for the SPPB-SI scores. Among the 40 participants (mean age: 72.98, SD: 9.27), the mean total SPPB-SI score was 7.72 ± 2.50, and the mean total SPPB-M score was 7.95 ± 2.63. The time recordings and measured scores of each SPPB-SI component exhibited high reliability with inter- and intra-interpreter correlation coefficients of 0.9 and 0.8 or higher, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the total SPPB-SI and SPPB-M scores was 0.831 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.