Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38139564›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Assessing Gait & Balance in Adults with Mild Balance Impairment: G&B App Reliability and Validity.

Hina Shafi, Waqar Ahmed Awan, Sharon Olsen, Furqan Ahmed Siddiqi, Naureen Tassadaq, Usman Rashid, Imran Khan Niazi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hina ShafiRiphah College of Rehabilitation & Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad 46000, Pakistan.
Waqar Ahmed AwanRiphah College of Rehabilitation & Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad 46000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8625-915X
Sharon OlsenHealth & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Faculty of Health & Environmental Sciences, AUT University, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7453-9127
Furqan Ahmed SiddiqiFoundation Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Foundation University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.
Naureen TassadaqFoundation Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Foundation University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.
Usman RashidHealth & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Faculty of Health & Environmental Sciences, AUT University, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1109-5493
Imran Khan NiaziHealth & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Faculty of Health & Environmental Sciences, AUT University, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8752-7224
Foundation University Islamabad · PKNew Zealand College of Chiropractic · NZAuckland University of Technology · NZRiphah International University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartphone applications (apps) that utilize embedded inertial sensors have the potential to provide valid and reliable estimations of different balance and gait parameters in older adults with mild balance impairment. This study aimed to assess the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Gait&Balance smartphone application (G&B App) for measuring gait and balance in a sample of middle- to older-aged adults with mild balance impairment in Pakistan. Community-dwelling adults over 50 years of age (N = 83, 50 female, range 50-75 years) with a Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score between 46/56 and 54/56 were included in the study. Data collection involved securing a smartphone to the participant's lumbosacral spine. Participants performed six standardized balance tasks, including four quiet stance tasks and two gait tasks (walking looking straight ahead and walking with head turns). The G&B App collected accelerometry data during these tasks, and the tasks were repeated twice to assess test-retest reliability. The tasks in quiet stance were also recorded with a force plate, a gold-standard technology for measuring postural sway. Additionally, participants completed three clinical measures, the BBS, the Functional Reach Test (FRT), and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). Test-retest reliability within the same session was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). Validity was evaluated by correlating the G&B App outcomes against both the force plate data and the clinical measures using Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficients. To assess the G&B App's sensitivity to differences in balance across tasks and repetitions, one-way repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted. During quiet stance, the app demonstrated moderate reliability for steadiness on firm (ICC = 0.72) and compliant surfaces (ICC = 0.75) with eyes closed. For gait tasks, the G&B App indicated moderate to excellent reliability when walking looking straight ahead for gait symmetry (ICC = 0.65), walking speed (ICC = 0.93), step length (ICC = 0.94), and step time (ICC = 0.84). The TUG correlated with app measures under both gait conditions for walking speed (r -0.70 and 0.67), step length (r -0.56 and -0.58), and step time (r 0.58 and 0.50). The BBS correlated with app measures of walking speed under both gait conditions (r 0.55 and 0.51) and step length when walking with head turns (r = 0.53). Force plate measures of total distance wandered showed adequate to excellent correlations with G&B App measures of steadiness. Notably, G&B App measures of walking speed, gait symmetry, step length, and step time, were sensitive to detecting differences in performance between standard walking and the more difficult task of walking with head turns. This study demonstrates the G&B App's potential as a reliable and valid tool for assessing some gait and balance parameters in middle-to-older age adults, with promise for application in low-income countries like Pakistan. The app's accessibility and accuracy could enhance healthcare services and support preventive measures related to fall risk.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdultAgedFemaleGaitHumansMiddle AgedPostural BalanceReproducibility of ResultsTime and Motion Studiesaccelerometerbalanceolder adultsreliabilitysmartphonevalidity

Identifiers

PMID38139564
PMCPMC10747653
OpenAlexW4389545556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.