ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Caffeine and Its Interactions with Antiseizure Medications-Is There a Correlation between Preclinical and Clinical Data?
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lamotrigine Therapy: Relation Between Treatment of Bipolar Affective Disorder and Incidence of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome-A Narrative Review of the Existing Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Effect of Lamotrigine on Refractory Epilepsy: Clinical Outcomes and EEG Changes.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experimental studies reveal that caffeine (trimethylxanthine) at subconvulsive doses, distinctly reduced the anticonvulsant activity of numerous antiseizure medications (ASMs) in rodents, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and lamotrigine being the exceptions. Clinical data based on low numbers of patients support the experimental results by showing that caffeine (ingested in high quantities) may sharply increase seizure frequency, considerably reducing the quality of patients' lives. In contrast, this obviously negative activity of caffeine was not found in clinical studies involving much higher numbers of patients. ASMs vulnerable to caffeine in experimental models of seizures encompass carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, valproate, gabapentin, levetiracetam, pregabalin and topiramate. An inhibition of R-calcium channels by lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine may account for their resistance to the trimethylxanthine. This assumption, however, is complicated by the fact that topiramate also seems to be a blocker of R-calcium channels. A question arises why large clinical studies failed to confirm the results of experimental and case-report studies. A possibility exists that the proportion of patients taking ASMs resistant to caffeine may be significant and such patients may be sufficiently protected against the negative activity of caffeine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.