ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Identification and Interpretation of A-to-I RNA Editing Events in Insect Transcriptomes.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Analysis of Lifecycle-Dependent A to I RNA Editing in Three Members of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A single-cell transcriptome atlas reveals paradoxical monoallelic expression of RNA editing and heterozygous SNPs.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- A-to-I mRNA editing: Why not simply incorporate inosine during mRNA synthesis?Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Abundant A-to-I RNA editing in spermatocytes may suppress transposons to compensate for piRNA downregulation in male germlines.RNA biology · 2025Article
- Accurate interpretation of inosines in RNAs: recognized as G is more than basepairing with C.Epigenomics · 2025Article
- Systematic revelation and meditation on the significance of long exons using representative eukaryotic genomes.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insectEpigenetics · 2024Article
- Adaptive evolution of A-to-I auto-editing site in Adar of eusocial insects.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- SnoRNAs: Exploring Their Implication in Human Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- New comparative genomic evidence supporting the proteomic diversification role of A-to-I RNA editing in insects.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2024Article
- The first A-to-I RNA editome of hemipteran species Coridius chinensis reveals overrepresented recoding and prevalent intron editing in early-diverging insects.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- Article
- Host-dependent C-to-U RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2 creates novel viral genes with optimized expressibility.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- An orthology-based methodology as a complementary approach to retrieve evolutionarily conserved A-to-I RNA editing sites.RNA biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is the most prevalent RNA modification in the nervous systems of metazoans. To study the biological significance of RNA editing, we first have to accurately identify these editing events from the transcriptome. The genome-wide identification of RNA editing sites remains a challenging task. In this review, we will first introduce the occurrence, regulation, and importance of A-to-I RNA editing and then describe the established bioinformatic procedures and difficulties in the accurate identification of these sit esespecially in small sized non-model insects. In brief, (1) to obtain an accurate profile of RNA editing sites, a transcriptome coupled with the DNA resequencing of a matched sample is favorable; (2) the single-cell sequencing technique is ready to be applied to RNA editing studies, but there are a few limitations to overcome; (3) during mapping and variant calling steps, various issues, like mapping and base quality, soft-clipping, and the positions of mismatches on reads, should be carefully considered; (4) Sanger sequencing of both RNA and the matched DNA is the best verification of RNA editing sites, but other auxiliary evidence, like the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous ratio or the linkage information, is also helpful for judging the reliability of editing sites. We have systematically reviewed the understanding of the biological significance of RNA editing and summarized the methodology for identifying such editing events. We also raised several promising aspects and challenges in this field. With insightful perspectives on both scientific and technical issues, our review will benefit the researchers in the broader RNA editing community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.