ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023
Blood Plasma Circulating DNA-Protein Complexes: Involvement in Carcinogenesis and Prospects for Liquid Biopsy of Breast Cancer.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Collagen proteins, thrombospondin 1 and lumican are differentially expressed across breast cancer subtypes by functional proteomics from core needle biopsy samples of Taiwanese breast cancer.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Exosomal MicroRNA: Diagnostic Potential and Role in Breast Cancer Dissemination.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Predicting survival and immune status of breast cancer patients based on prognostic features related to PANoptosis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- DNA-Binding Proteins and Passenger Proteins in Plasma DNA-Protein Complexes: Imprint of Parental Cells or Key Mediators of Carcinogenesis Processes?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating DNA (cirDNA) is a promising tool in translational medicine. However, studies of cirDNA have neglected its association with proteins, despite ample evidence that this interaction may affect the fate of DNA in the bloodstream and its molecular functions. The goal of the current study is to shed light on the differences between the proteomic cargos of histone-containing nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) from healthy female (HFs) and breast cancer patients (BCPs), and to reveal the proteins involved in carcinogenesis. NPCs were isolated from the blood samples of HFs and BCPs using affinity chromatography. A total of 177 and 169 proteins were identified in NPCs from HFs and BCPs using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. A bioinformatics analysis revealed that catalytically active proteins, as well as proteins that bind nucleic acids and regulate the activity of receptors, are the most represented among the unique proteins of blood NPCs from HFs and BCPs. In addition, the proportion of proteins participating in ion channels and proteins binding proteins increases in the NPCs from BCP blood. However, the involvement in transport and signal transduction was greater in BCP NPCs compared to those from HFs. Gene ontology term (GO) analysis revealed that the NPC protein cargo from HF blood was enriched with proteins involved in the negative regulation of cell proliferation, and in BCP blood, proteins involved in EMT, invasion, and cell migration were observed. The combination of SPG7, ADRB1, SMCO4, PHF1, and PSMG1 NPC proteins differentiates BCPs from HFs with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%. The obtained results indirectly indicate that, in tandem with proteins, blood cirDNA is an important part of intercellular communication, playing a regulatory and integrating role in the physiology of the body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.