Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38138912›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Variability in Provider Assessment of Sepsis and Potential of Host Response Technology to Address this Dilemma-Results of an Online Delphi Study.

Chadd K Kraus, Hollis R O'Neal, Nathan A Ledeboer, Todd W Rice, Wesley H Self, Richard E Rothman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chadd K KrausDepartment of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network (LVHN), University of South Florida (USF) Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL 33602, USA.
Hollis R O'NealDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Nathan A LedeboerDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Todd W RiceDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Wesley H SelfDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9300-3045
Richard E RothmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potentially septic patients have a huge clinical and economic impact on hospitals and often present to the emergency department (ED) with undifferentiated symptoms. The triage of these patients is complex and has historically relied heavily upon provider judgment. This study aims to evaluate the consistency of provider judgment and the potential of a new host response sepsis test to aid in the triage process. A modified Delphi study involving 26 participants from multiple specialties was conducted to evaluate provider agreement about sepsis risk and to test proposed actions based on the results of a sepsis test. The participants considered case vignettes of potentially septic patients designed to represent diagnostic dilemmas. Provider assessment of sepsis risk in these cases ranged from 10% to 90% and agreement was poor. Agreement about clinical actions to take in response to testing improved when participants considered their own hypothetical borderline cases. New host response testing for sepsis may have the potential to improve sepsis diagnosis and care and should be applied in a protocolized fashion to ensure consistency of results.

Indexed as

emergency departmenthost response testingsepsissepsis protocoltriage

Identifiers

PMID38138912
PMCPMC10744443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.