Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38138904›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Navigating through the Controversies and Emerging Paradigms in Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Bridging the Gap from Classic RCTs to Modern Population-Based Pilot Programs.

Juan Gómez Rivas, Renée C A Leenen, Lionne D F Venderbos, Jozien Helleman, Irene de la Parra, Vera Vasilyeva, Jesús Moreno-Sierra, Partha Basu, Arunah Chandran, Roderick C N van den Bergh and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A guide to cancer screening.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Prostate cancer screening.Asian journal of urology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Juan Gómez RivasDepartment of Urology, Health Research Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0556-3035
Renée C A LeenenDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lionne D F VenderbosDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4269-0623
Jozien HellemanDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Irene de la ParraDepartment of Urology, Health Research Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Vera VasilyevaEuropean Association of Urology, Guidelines Office, PO Box 30016 6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Jesús Moreno-SierraDepartment of Urology, Health Research Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6837-7718
Partha BasuInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69366 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0124-4050
Arunah ChandranInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69366 Lyon, France.
Roderick C N van den BerghDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sarah CollenEuropean Association of Urology, Guidelines Office, PO Box 30016 6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Hein Van PoppelEuropean Association of Urology, EAU Policy Office, PO Box 30016 6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7458-8578
Monique J RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6967-1708
Katharina BeyerDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
The PRAISE-U Consortium
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLEuropean Association of Urology · NLHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last three decades, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and the US-based Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening have steered the conversation around the early detection of prostate cancer. These two randomized trials assessed the effect of screening on prostate cancer disease-specific mortality. Elevated PSA levels were followed by a systematic sextant prostate biopsy. Standard repeat testing intervals were applied. After controversies from 2009 to 2016 due to contradicting results of the two trials, the results aligned in 2016 and showed that early PSA detection reduces prostate cancer-specific mortality. However, overdiagnosis rates of up to 50% were reported, and this sparked an intense debate on harms and benefits for almost 20 years. The balance between harms and benefits is highly debated and has initiated further research to investigate new ways of early detection. In the meantime, the knowledge and tools for the diagnostic algorithm improved. This is a continuously ongoing effort which focuses on individual risk-based screening algorithms that preserve the benefits of the purely PSA-based screening algorithms, while reducing the side effects. An important push towards investigating new techniques for early detection came from the European Commission on the 20th of September 2022. The European Commission published its updated recommendation to investigate prostate, lung, and gastric cancer early detection programs. This opened a new window of opportunity to move away from the trial setting to population-based early detection settings. With this review, we aim to review 30 years of historical evidence of prostate cancer screening, which led to the initiation of the 'The Prostate Cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union' (PRAISE-U) project, which aims to encourage the early detection and diagnosis of PCa through customized and risk-based screening programs.

Indexed as

early detectionoverdiagnosisovertreatmentPRAISE-Uprostate cancerscreening

Identifiers

PMID38138904
PMCPMC10744765
OpenAlexW4389225521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.