Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38138871›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Use of Autologous Bone Graft with Bioactive Glass as a Bone Substitute in the Treatment of Large-Sized Bone Defects of the Femur and Tibia.

Sebastian Findeisen, Niklas Gräfe, Melanie Schwilk, Thomas Ferbert, Lars Helbig, Patrick Haubruck, Gerhard Schmidmaier, Michael Tanner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Research progress of electroactivity graphene-based materials in bone repair].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Applications and prospects of graphene and its derivatives in bone repair].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian FindeisenClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Niklas GräfeClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-8203-2588
Melanie SchwilkClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas FerbertClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Lars HelbigClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrick HaubruckClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Gerhard SchmidmaierClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael TannerClinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManaging bone defects in non-union surgery remains challenging, especially in cases of large defects exceeding 5 cm in size. Historically, amputation and compound osteosynthesis with a remaining PMMA spacer have been viable and commonly used options. The risk of non-union after fractures varies between 2% and 30% and is dependent on various factors. Autologous bone grafts from the iliac crest are still considered the gold standard but are limited in availability, prompting consideration of artificial grafts.

objectivesThe aims and objectives of the study are as follows: 1. To evaluate the radiological outcome of e.g., the consolidation and thus the stability of the bone (three out of four consolidated cortices/Lane-Sandhu-score of at least 3) by using S53P4-type bioactive glass (BaG) as a substitute material for large-sized bone defects in combination with autologous bone using the RIA technique. 2. To determine noticeable data-points as a base for future studies.

methodsIn our clinic, 13 patients received bioactive glass (BaG) as a substitute in non-union therapy to promote osteoconductive aspects. BaG is a synthetic material composed of sodium, silicate, calcium, and phosphate. The primary endpoint of our study was to evaluate the radiological consolidation of bone after one and two years. To assess bone stabilization, we used a modified Lane-Sandhu score, considering only radiological criteria. A bone was considered stabilized if it achieved a minimum score of 3. For full consolidation (all four cortices consolidated), a minimum score of 4 was required. Each bone defect exceeded 5 cm in length, with an average size of 6.69 ± 1.92 cm.

resultsThe mean follow-up period for patients without final bone consolidation was 34.25 months, with a standard deviation of 14.57 months, a median of 32.00 months and a range of 33 months. In contrast, patients with a fully consolidated non-union had an average follow-up of 20.11 ± 15.69 months and a range of 45 months. Overall, the mean time from non-union surgery to consolidation for patients who achieved final union was 14.91 ± 6.70 months. After one year, six patients (46.2%) achieved complete bone consolidation according to the Lane-Sandhu score. Three patients (23.1%) displayed evident callus formation with expected stability, while three patients (23.1%) did not develop any callus, and one patient only formed a minimal callus with no expected stability. After two years, 9 out of 13 patients (69.2%) had a score of 4. The remaining four patients (30.8%) without expected stability either did not heal within two years or required a revision during that time.

conclusionsBioactive glass (BaG) in combination with autologous bone (RIA) appears to be a suitable filler material for treating extensive non-unions of the femur and tibia. This approach seems to show non-inferiority to treatment with Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP). To ensure the success of this treatment, it is crucial to validate the procedure through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a control group using TCP, which would provide higher statistical power and more reliable results.

Indexed as

bioglassbone healingbone reconstructionMasquelet techniquenonunionS53P4segmental bone defect

Identifiers

PMID38138871
PMCPMC10744955
OpenAlexW4389050385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.