Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38138868›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2023

Sedation for Patients with Sepsis: Towards a Personalised Approach.

José Miguel Marcos-Vidal, Rafael González, María Merino, Eva Higuera, Cristina García

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José Miguel Marcos-VidalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Universitary Hospital of Leon, 24071 Leon, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2802-7251
Rafael GonzálezDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Universitary Hospital of Leon, 24071 Leon, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8130-3465
María MerinoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Universitary Hospital of Leon, 24071 Leon, Spain.
Eva HigueraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Universitary Hospital of Leon, 24071 Leon, Spain.
Cristina GarcíaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Universitary Hospital of Leon, 24071 Leon, Spain.
Hospital de León · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article looks at the challenges of sedoanalgesia for sepsis patients, and argues for a personalised approach. Sedation is a necessary part of treatment for patients in intensive care to reduce stress and anxiety and improve long-term prognoses. Sepsis patients present particular difficulties as they are at increased risk of a wide range of complications, such as multiple organ failure, neurological dysfunction, septic shock, ARDS, abdominal compartment syndrome, vasoplegic syndrome, and myocardial dysfunction. The development of any one of these complications can cause the patient's rapid deterioration, and each has distinct implications in terms of appropriate and safe forms of sedation. In this way, the present article reviews the sedative and analgesic drugs commonly used in the ICU and, placing special emphasis on their strategic administration in sepsis patients, develops a set of proposals for sedoanalgesia aimed at improving outcomes for this group of patients. These proposals represent a move away from simplistic approaches like avoiding benzodiazepines to more "objective-guided sedation" that accounts for a patient's principal pathology, as well as any comorbidities, and takes full advantage of the therapeutic arsenal currently available to achieve personalised, patient-centred treatment goals.

Indexed as

intensive care unitsedationsepsis

Identifiers

PMID38138868
PMCPMC10744994
OpenAlexW4388973495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.