ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Correction Factors for Sclerometric Test Results in the Technical Assessment of Timber Structural Elements under Diverse Conditions.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Element Size on Rebar-Concrete Interface Microstructure Using X-ray Computed Tomography.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on existing wooden structures relies on non-destructive and semi-destructive techniques. One of the methods enabling the estimation of the physico-mechanical characteristics of wood in building structures based on established correlational relationships is the sclerometric method. The challenge in utilizing these known correlational relationships is the lack of data regarding the impact of frequently occurring factors in objects on sclerometric test results. This paper presents the influence of selected factors on the results of sclerometric tests, such as temperature, the direction of testing in relation to annual growth rings, and the physical orientation of the measuring device. The research was conducted on pine, spruce, and fir elements, each subjected exclusively to the influence of one of these factors. The study indicates that these factors should not be overlooked in assessing technical conditions using sclerometric testing methods. The impact of temperature on sclerometric test results is relatively small; a change in temperature of 10 °C results in an average test outcome change of approximately 3%. Conversely, changing the orientation of the measuring device from horizontal to vertical can alter the test result by up to 10%. The direction of testing relative to the annual increments of wood also has a significant impact on the test results, but incorporating this factor into practice seems to be quite difficult, and in the case of elements with substantial cross-sections, it is also not required. The obtained results enable the application of established correlational relationships in the structural analysis of wooden elements for which access is challenging, especially under temperature conditions different from the reference, 20 °C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.