Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38138612›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Optimization of Ethanol Extraction Technology for Yujin Powder Using Response Surface Methodology with a Box-Behnken Design Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process-Criteria Importance through Intercriteria Correlation Weight Analysis and Its Safety Evaluation.

Lidong Jiang, Wangdong Zhang, Wenbo Zhao, Yanzi Cai, Xue Qin, Baoshan Wang, Jiao Xue, Yanqiao Wen, Yanming Wei, Yongli Hua and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lidong JiangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Wangdong ZhangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Wenbo ZhaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Yanzi CaiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Xue QinCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Baoshan WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Jiao XueCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Yanqiao WenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Yanming WeiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Yongli HuaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Wanling YaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4229-9170

Funding

China Agriculture Research System-37 CARS-37National Natural Science Foundation of China No31802231Scientific research start-up funds for openly recruited doctors 2017RCZX-14Youth mentor support fund of Gansu Agricultural University GAU-ODFC-2022-09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we aimed to optimize the ethanol extraction technology for Yujin powder (YJP) and evaluate its safety. The ultrasonic-assisted ethanol reflux extraction method refluxing was used to extract YJP. The parameters were optimized through a combination of single-factor and response surface methodology (RSM). The comprehensive Y value score calculated using the content of 13 active ingredients in YJP ethanolic extracts (YEEs) and the yield of the dry extract were used as measuring criteria. RSM with a Box-Behnken design using three factors and three levels was adopted to optimize the ethanol extraction technology for YJP. Finally, acute and subchronic toxicity tests were performed to evaluate its safety. The results revealed the best technological parameters: a liquid-material ratio of 24:1, an ethanol concentration of 69%, assistance of ultrasound (40 °C, 50 kHZ, 30 min), reflux time of 53 min, and reflux temperature of 50 °C. In acute toxicity tests, the maximum administration dosage in mice was 28.21 g/kg, which is higher than 10 times the clinical dosage. Adverse effects in the acute and subchronic toxicity tests were not observed. All clinical indexes were normal. In conclusion, the RSM based on AHP-CRITIC weight analysis could be used to optimize the ethanol extraction technology for YJP and YEEs prepared under the above conditions and ensure high safety.

Indexed as

Drugs, Chinese HerbalEthanolAnalytic Hierarchy ProcessAnimalsMicePlant ExtractsTemperatureDrugs, Chinese HerbalEthanolPlant Extractsyujin powderAHP-CRITIC mixed weighting methodethanol extractsresponse surface methodsafety testsingle factor testYujin powder

Identifiers

PMID38138612
PMCPMC10746038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.