ArticleMicromachines2023
A Rapid Prototyping Approach for Multi-Material, Reversibly Sealed Microfluidics.
Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissociable perfusion chip (DPC): perfusable microfluidic chip for single-cell screening of anti-cancer drugs in live glioblastoma explants.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- Zweifach-Fung Microfluidic Device for Efficient Microparticle Separation: Cost-Effective Fabrication Using COMicromachines · 2024Article
- Effective and new technologies in kidney tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidic organ-on-chip models recapitulate increasingly complex physiological phenomena to study tissue development and disease mechanisms, where there is a growing interest in retrieving delicate biological structures from these devices for downstream analysis. Standard bonding techniques, however, often utilize irreversible sealing, making sample retrieval unfeasible or necessitating destructive methods for disassembly. To address this, several commercial devices employ reversible sealing techniques, though integrating these techniques into early-stage prototyping workflows is often ignored because of the variation and complexity of microfluidic designs. Here, we demonstrate the concerted use of rapid prototyping techniques, including 3D printing and laser cutting, to produce multi-material microfluidic devices that can be reversibly sealed. This is enhanced via the incorporation of acrylic components directly into polydimethylsiloxane channel layers to enhance stability, sealing, and handling. These acrylic components act as a rigid surface separating the multiple mechanical seals created between the bottom substrate, the microfluidic features in the device, and the fluidic interconnect to external tubing, allowing for greater design flexibility. We demonstrate that these devices can be produced reproducibly outside of a cleanroom environment and that they can withstand ~1 bar pressures that are appropriate for a wide range of biological applications. By presenting an accessible and low-cost method, we hope to enable microfluidic prototyping for a broad range of biomedical research applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.