Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38138282›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2023

Point-of-Care Ultrasound-History, Current and Evolving Clinical Concepts in Emergency Medicine.

Joseph Osterwalder, Effie Polyzogopoulou, Beatrice Hoffmann

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06844331 (ULtrasOund Applicability in the Assessment of Patients With fibRosing Interstitial Lung Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06844331 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

ULtrasOund Applicability in the Assessment of Patients With fibRosing Interstitial Lung Disease (LORD): A Research Protocol of a Single Center, Real-life, Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled117ConditionsFibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases, Thoracic UltrasoundArmsThoracic ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Effect of optimal operator positioning on transcranial Doppler acquisition: a randomized controlled trial.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. AI-Enhanced POCUS in Emergency Care.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph OsterwalderPolipraxis, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Effie PolyzogopoulouEmergency Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7585-1203
Beatrice HoffmannDepartment of Emergency Medicine BIDMC, One Deaconess Rd., WCC2, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1820-9430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) has become an indispensable standard in emergency medicine. Emergency medicine ultrasound (EMUS) is the application of bedside PoCUS by the attending emergency physician to assist in the diagnosis and management of many time-sensitive health emergencies. In many ways, using PoCUS is not only the mere application of technology, but also a fusion of already existing examiner skills and technology in the context of a patient encounter. EMUS practice can be defined using distinct anatomy-based applications. The type of applications and their complexity usually depend on local needs and resources, and practice patterns can vary significantly among regions, countries, or even continents. A different approach suggests defining EMUS in categories such as resuscitative, diagnostic, procedural guidance, symptom- or sign-based, and therapeutic. Because EMUS is practiced in a constantly evolving emergency medical setting where no two patient encounters are identical, the concept of EMUS should also be practiced in a fluid, constantly adapting manner driven by the physician treating the patient. Many recent advances in ultrasound technology have received little or no attention from the EMUS community, and several important technical advances and research findings have not been translated into routine clinical practice. The authors believe that four main areas have great potential for the future growth and development of EMUS and are worth integrating: 1. In recent years, many articles have been published on novel ultrasound applications. Only a small percentage has found its way into routine use. We will discuss two important examples: trauma ultrasound that goes beyond e-FAST and EMUS lung ultrasound for suspected pulmonary embolism. 2. The more ultrasound equipment becomes financially affordable; the more ultrasound should be incorporated into the physical examination. This merging and possibly even replacement of aspects of the classical physical exam by technology will likely outperform the isolated use of stethoscope, percussion, and auscultation. 3. The knowledge of pathophysiological processes in acute illness and ultrasound findings should be merged in clinical practice. The translation of this knowledge into practical concepts will allow us to better manage many presentations, such as hypotension or the dyspnea of unclear etiology. 4. Technical innovations such as elastography; CEUS; highly sensitive color Doppler such as M-flow, vector flow, or other novel technology; artificial intelligence; cloud-based POCUS functions; and augmented reality devices such as smart glasses should become standard in emergencies over time.

Indexed as

Emergency MedicinePoint-of-Care SystemsArtificial IntelligenceEmergenciesHumansUltrasonographyclinical sonographydiagnosisemergency medicinePOCUSultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38138282
PMCPMC10744481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.