Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38137954›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Transspinal Direct Current Electrical Stimulation Selectively Affects the Excitability of the Corticospinal System, Depending on the Intensity but Not Motor Skills.

Alena Popyvanova, Ekaterina Pomelova, Dmitry Bredikhin, Maria Koriakina, Anna Shestakova, Evgeny Blagovechtchenski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alena PopyvanovaCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina PomelovaCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0420-0221
Dmitry BredikhinCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.
Maria KoriakinaCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.
Anna ShestakovaCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.
Evgeny BlagovechtchenskiCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-6633
National Research University Higher School of Economics · RU

Funding

National Research University Higher School of Economics 075-15-2021-673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a non-invasive technique used to modulate spinal cord activity. However, the effects and mechanisms of this stimulation are currently not comprehensively known. This study aimed to estimate the effect of different intensities of tsDCS applied at the level of cervical enlargement of the spinal cord (C7-Th1 segments) on the excitability of the corticospinal system (CSS) and the correction of motor skills in healthy subjects. The effect of tsDCS was estimated by the motor-evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the primary motor cortex (M1). The study involved 54 healthy adults aged 22 ± 4 years. The application of 11 min anodal tsDCS at the level of the cervical spine C7-Th1 with a current intensity of 2.5 mA did not change the MEP amplitude of the upper limb muscles, in contrast to the data that we previously obtained with a current intensity of 1.5 mA. We also found no difference in the effect of 2.5 mA stimulation on motor skill correction in healthy subjects in the nine-hole peg test (9-HPT) and the serial reaction time task (SRT) as with 1.5 mA stimulation. Our data show that an increase in the intensity of stimulation does not lead to an increase in the effects but rather reduces the effects of stimulation. These results provide information about the optimally appropriate stimulation current intensities to induce CSS excitability and the ability of tsDCS to influence motor skills in healthy adults.

Indexed as

motor skillsnon-invasive brain stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulationtransspinal stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38137954
PMCPMC10744344
OpenAlexW4389917126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.