ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Basic ctDNA Panel Promises Affordable Clinical Validity in Colon Cancer Patients but Not in Pancreas Cancer Patients.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Personalized tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA monitoring for early detection of recurrence in postoperative pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The potential of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker to assess the progression of various solid tumors has been explored extensively. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of utilizing a ctDNA sequencing panel specifically designed to target the most frequently mutated genomic regions in colon and pancreas cancers. Through somatic analysis of colon and pancreas tumors, we targeted 27 regions within eight genes. By employing PCR amplification and Illumina NGS, we ensured that each region was adequately covered with a minimum of 5000 reads (with an average of 12,000 reads). Our method exhibited reproducibility with repetition and dilutions. The positive detection threshold for ctDNA was set at a cutoff value of 0.5% ctDNA of the total reads using IGV. Among the samples analyzed, 71% of colon cancer cases displayed somatic mutations covered by the targeted regions. Within this group, detectable ctDNA was observed in 34% of the cases. Conversely, in pancreatic cancer, 55% of mutations were covered by the panel's regions, but only 13% of these cases exhibited detectable ctDNA. In follow-ups with the patients, changes in ctDNA percentages demonstrated complete concordance with changes in the clinical condition in 88% of the cases. Our findings suggest that employing a basic ctDNA-targeted panel can serve as a cost-effective and reliable approach for repeated monitoring of the efficacy of colon cancer therapy. However, in the case of pancreatic cancer, ctDNA showed limited utility, and alternative biomarkers may offer superior diagnostic value. Additionally, we found that a negative ctDNA test is not a guarantee for a relapse-free recovery; thus, we recommend a continuous follow-up with the patient on a long-term basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.