Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38137875›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Basic ctDNA Panel Promises Affordable Clinical Validity in Colon Cancer Patients but Not in Pancreas Cancer Patients.

Mandy Radefeldt, Silke Stellmacher-Kaiser, Susann Krake, Brigitte Kragl, Sabrina Lemke, Christian Beetz, Peter Bauer, Christian Junghanß, Ruslan Al-Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mandy RadefeldtCENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.
Silke Stellmacher-KaiserClinical for Internal Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Susann KrakeCENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.
Brigitte KraglClinical for Internal Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Sabrina LemkeCENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.
Christian BeetzCENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7061-2895
Peter BauerCENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9414-4555
Christian JunghanßClinical for Internal Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Ruslan Al-AliCENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0189-3774

Funding

European Regional Development Fund TBI-V-240-VBW-084, TBI-V-241-VBW-084, TBI-V-242-VBW-084, TBI-V-243-VBW-084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker to assess the progression of various solid tumors has been explored extensively. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of utilizing a ctDNA sequencing panel specifically designed to target the most frequently mutated genomic regions in colon and pancreas cancers. Through somatic analysis of colon and pancreas tumors, we targeted 27 regions within eight genes. By employing PCR amplification and Illumina NGS, we ensured that each region was adequately covered with a minimum of 5000 reads (with an average of 12,000 reads). Our method exhibited reproducibility with repetition and dilutions. The positive detection threshold for ctDNA was set at a cutoff value of 0.5% ctDNA of the total reads using IGV. Among the samples analyzed, 71% of colon cancer cases displayed somatic mutations covered by the targeted regions. Within this group, detectable ctDNA was observed in 34% of the cases. Conversely, in pancreatic cancer, 55% of mutations were covered by the panel's regions, but only 13% of these cases exhibited detectable ctDNA. In follow-ups with the patients, changes in ctDNA percentages demonstrated complete concordance with changes in the clinical condition in 88% of the cases. Our findings suggest that employing a basic ctDNA-targeted panel can serve as a cost-effective and reliable approach for repeated monitoring of the efficacy of colon cancer therapy. However, in the case of pancreatic cancer, ctDNA showed limited utility, and alternative biomarkers may offer superior diagnostic value. Additionally, we found that a negative ctDNA test is not a guarantee for a relapse-free recovery; thus, we recommend a continuous follow-up with the patient on a long-term basis.

Indexed as

biomarkercancercolonctDNApancreaspanel

Identifiers

PMID38137875
PMCPMC10744654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.