Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38137724›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Predictive Performance of Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) for Survival after Resuscitation from Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Krzysztof Kurek, Damian Swieczkowski, Michal Pruc, Monika Tomaszewska, Wieslaw Jerzy Cubala, Lukasz Szarpak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Early multimodal predictors of good neurological outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest: a prospective single-center cohort study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biomarkers in Cardiac Arrest: A Narrative Review.Therapeutic advances in pulmonary and critical care medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Krzysztof KurekDepartment of Clinical Research and Development, LUXMED Group, 02-676 Warsaw, Poland.
Damian SwieczkowskiDepartment of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5648-4652
Michal PrucResearch Unit, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, 05-806 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2140-9732
Monika TomaszewskaDepartment of Clinical Research and Development, LUXMED Group, 02-676 Warsaw, Poland.
Wieslaw Jerzy CubalaDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6343-8454
Lukasz SzarpakInstitute of Outcomes Research, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Medical Academy, 03-411 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-5455
Gdańsk Medical University · PLInternational Center for Astronomical, Medical and Ecological Research · UAMedical University of Białystok · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of outcomes following cardiac arrest continues to provide significant difficulties. A preferred strategy involves adopting a multimodal approach, which encompasses the careful evaluation of the biomarker neuron-specific enolase (NSE). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to gather and summarize new and existing evidence on the prediction effect of neuron-specific enolase for survival to hospital discharge among adult patients with cardiac arrest. We searched PubMed Central, Scopus, EMBASE databases, and the Cochrane Library without language restrictions from their inceptions until 30 October 2023 and checked the reference lists of the included studies. Pooled results were reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and were presented with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge (SHD). Eighty-six articles with 10,845 participants were included. NSE showed a notable degree of specificity in its ability to predict mortality as well as neurological status among individuals who experienced cardiac arrest (

Indexed as

biological markerbiomarkercardiac arrestcardiopulmonary resuscitationevidence-based medicinemeta-analysisneuron-specific enolaseNSEprognosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID38137724
PMCPMC10744223
OpenAlexW4389686562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.