Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38137625›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Healing Outcomes in Clinical and Pre-Clinical Models to Treat Pressure Ulcers: A Systematic Review.

Ricardo A Torres-Guzman, Francisco R Avila, Karla Maita, John P Garcia, Gioacchino D De Sario, Sahar Borna, Abdullah S Eldaly, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, Abba C Zubair, Olivia A Ho and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prehabilitation for Pressure Ulcer Surgery: A Practical and Evidence-based Guide.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ricardo A Torres-GuzmanDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4546-551X
Francisco R AvilaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Karla MaitaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
John P GarciaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Gioacchino D De SarioDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-7682-2438
Sahar BornaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7845-7356
Abdullah S EldalyDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Alfredo Quinones-HinojosaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Abba C ZubairDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Transfusion Medicines and Stem Cell Therapy, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4827-4740
Olivia A HoDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Antonio J ForteDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2004-7538
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite numerous measures used to prevent pressure ulcers, their growing prevalence in recent years is expected to continue as the population ages. This review aims to report the outcomes of the regenerative potential of MSCs in treating pressure ulcers, assessing the effectiveness of MSCs in treating pressure ulcers.

methodsA computerized search for articles on animal models that use MSCs as primary therapy to treat pressure ulcers, published from conception to present, was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Our search yielded 52 articles, narrowed to 44 after excluding duplicates.

resultsOut of 52 articles collected from four databases, 11 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 11 articles published between 2008 and 2020 met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies were observational descriptive papers in animal models, and three were prospective. Six studies used autologous MSCs, while five used allogenic MSCs. Three studies were conducted in humans, and the remaining eight were conducted in animals. The most common method of cell delivery was an intradermal injection in the margins of the ulcer. All studies reported positive results, including improved wound healing, reduced inflammation, and improved tissue regeneration.

conclusionsMSCs have shown promising results in treating pressure ulcers in animal and clinical trials. The combination of MSCs and scaffold materials has also been studied and found to be effective in wound healing. A standardized human wound model has been proposed further to investigate the efficacy of cell-based therapies for chronic wounds. However, more research is needed to determine the best quantity of cells to apply for pressure ulcers and to ensure the safety and efficacy of these treatments in clinical settings.

Indexed as

animal modelpressure sorestissue engineeringwounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID38137625
PMCPMC10743704
OpenAlexW4389438080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.