Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38137589›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Risk Factors for Spinal Cord Injury during Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm: Review of the Literature and Proposal of a Prognostic Score.

Laurent Brisard, Salma El Batti, Ottavia Borghese, Blandine Maurel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laurent BrisardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Laënnec Hospital, University Hospital of Nantes, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Salma El BattiDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris Cité, F-75015 Paris, France.
Ottavia BorgheseDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, L'Institut du Thorax, Nantes University Hospital, F-44093 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2422-5517
Blandine MaurelDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, L'Institut du Thorax, Nantes University Hospital, F-44093 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8957-6951
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Laennec · FRInstitut du Thorax · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent improvements, spinal cord ischemia remains the most feared and dramatic complication following extensive aortic repair. Although endovascular procedures are associated with a lower risk compared with open procedures, this risk is still significant and must be considered. A combined medical and surgical approach may help to optimize the tolerance of the spinal cord to ischemia. The aim of this review is to describe the underlying mechanism involved in spinal cord injury during extensive endovascular aortic repair, to describe the different techniques used to improve spinal cord tolerance to ischemia-including the prophylactic or curative use of spinal drainage-and to propose our algorithm for spinal cord protection and the rational use of spinal drainage.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluid drainageendovascular aortic repairparaplegiaspinal cord injuryspinal cord ischemiaspinal cord preservation

Identifiers

PMID38137589
PMCPMC10743399
OpenAlexW4389334102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.