ArticleBiomedicines2023
Two-Time Multiplexed Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Might Help the Implementation of Germline Screening Tools for Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Hematologic Neoplasms.
Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DifferentCancers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) tools have importantly helped the classification of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), guiding the management of patients. However, new concerns are under debate regarding their implementation in routine clinical practice for the identification of germline predisposition. Cost-effective targeted NGS tools would improve the current standardized studies and genetic counseling. Here, we present our experience in a preliminary study detecting variants using a two-time multiplexed library strategy. Samples from different MDS patients were first mixed before library preparation and later multiplexed for a sequencing run. Two different mixes including a pool of three (3×) and four (4×) samples were evaluated. The filtered variants found in the individually sequenced samples were compared with the variants found in the two-time multiplexed studies to determine the detection efficiency scores. The same candidate variants were found in the two-time multiplexed studies in comparison with the individual tNGS. The variant allele frequency (VAF) values of the candidate variants were also compared. No significant differences were found between the expected and observed VAF percentages in both the 3× (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.