Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38137177›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2023

Challenge Level Contributes to the Efficacy of Treadmill Interventions after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sharon Olsen, Gemma Alder, Usman Rashid, Emeline Gomes, Madeleine Aislabie, Fran Chee, Caitlin Smith, Brody Kean, Nicola Towersey, Nada Signal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sharon OlsenRehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7453-9127
Gemma AlderRehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8833-0375
Usman RashidRehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1109-5493
Emeline GomesRehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.
Madeleine AislabieRehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.
Fran CheeRehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.
Caitlin SmithRehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.
Brody KeanRehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.
Nicola TowerseyRehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.
Nada SignalRehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9595-0532

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intervention parameters such as the challenge, amount, and dosage (challenge × amount) have the potential to alter the efficacy of rehabilitation interventions after stroke. This systematic review investigated the effect of intervention parameters of challenge, amount, and dosage on improvements in walking outcomes following treadmill training (TT) and comparison interventions in people with stroke. Randomized controlled trials were included if they: (i) investigated interventions of TT or bodyweight-supported TT (BWSTT); (ii) made comparisons with other physiotherapy interventions, other types of TT, or no intervention; (iii) studied people with stroke; (iv) reported sufficient data on challenge and amount parameters; and (v) measured walking speed or endurance. Completeness of reporting was evaluated using the TIDieR-Rehab checklist and risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The review included 26 studies; 15 studies compared TT or BWSTT with other physiotherapy interventions and 11 studies compared different types of TT. Meta-analyses provided evidence with low to moderate certainty that greater differences in challenge and dosage between treadmill and comparison physiotherapy interventions produced greater effects on walking endurance (

Indexed as

challengedosagedoseintensityintervention reportingstroketreadmill training

Identifiers

PMID38137177
PMCPMC10741427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.