Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38137166›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Drug-Free Noninvasive Thermal Nerve Block: Validation of Sham Devices.

Michael A Fishman, Ahish Chitneni, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Samuel Grodofsky, Ashley M Scherer, Brendan Schetzner, Malvina Klusek, Stephen R Popielarski, Stephen Meloni, Steven Falowski and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Michael A FishmanCenter for Pain Control PC, Lancaster, PA 19610, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6051-5909
Ahish ChitneniDepartment of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia and Cornell, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5393-4569
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesia, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
Samuel GrodofskyPhiladelphia Smart Pain & Wellness, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19610, USA.
Ashley M SchererCenter for Pain Control PC, Lancaster, PA 19610, USA.
Brendan SchetznerDepartment of Anesthesiology, St Elizabeths Medical Center, Brighton, MA 02135, USA.
Malvina KlusekPeconic Bay Medical Center/Northwell Health, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Stephen R PopielarskiThermaquil, Inc., Philadelphia, PA 19610, USA.
Stephen MeloniThermaquil, Inc., Philadelphia, PA 19610, USA.
Steven FalowskiNeurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA 19610, USA.
Philip KimCenter for Interventional Pain Spine, LLC, Wilmington, DE 19803, USA.
Konstantin V SlavinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7946-8639
Stephen D SilbersteinJefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
International Spine, Pain & Performance · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USNorthwell Health · USSt. Elizabeth's Medical Center · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Headache is a leading cause of disability and suffering. One major challenge in developing device treatments is demonstrating their efficacy given devices' often-high placebo rate. This paper reviews the importance of validating sham devices as part of finalizing the design for larger-scale prospective randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic headache as well as the results of a prospective, single-blind trial to validate two potential sham noninvasive thermal nerve block devices. Study participants were trained to self-administer thermal nerve block treatment using sham devices in an office visit. Two different sham systems with different temperature profiles were assessed. Devices were offered for patients to use daily at-home for one week to assess the durability of sham placebo effects before participants were given active treatment in a second office visit followed by another optional week of self-administered active treatment at-home use. Sham treatments reduced pain scores by an average of 31% from 6.0 ± 2.3 to 4.3 ± 3.3, including two participants who fell asleep during the in-office treatment and woke up with no pain, but whose pain recurred after returning home during at-home use of the sham system. In-office active treatments reduced pain scores by 52% from 6.7 ± 2.1 to 3.3 ± 2.9 with sustained pain relief during optional at-home use. Successful blinding for the study was confirmed with an ideal Bang's Blinding Index of 0 and an ideal James' Blinding Index of 1. Both the sham and active treatments were viewed by participants as highly credible, and credibility increased from the beginning to end of sham treatments on average.

Indexed as

chronic paindrug-free nerve blocksham devicethermal nerve block

Identifiers

PMID38137166
PMCPMC10741966
OpenAlexW4389786509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.