Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38137110›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Determining the Optimal Stimulation Sessions for TMS-Induced Recovery of Upper Extremity Motor Function Post Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Yichen Lv, Jack Jiaqi Zhang, Kui Wang, Leilei Ju, Hongying Zhang, Yuehan Zhao, Yao Pan, Jianwei Gong, Xin Wang, Kenneth N K Fong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic review: Resting state functional MRI as a biomarker for non-invasive brain stimulation in upper limb recovery post-stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yichen LvSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264000, China.
Jack Jiaqi ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4656-1909
Kui WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China.
Leilei JuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China.
Hongying ZhangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China.
Yuehan ZhaoSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264000, China.
Yao PanSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264000, China.
Jianwei GongSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264000, China.
Xin WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China.
Kenneth N K FongDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5909-4847
Binzhou Medical University · CNYangzhou University · CNHong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072533Science and Technology Development Planning Project of Guangzhou 202102080079Science and Technology Development Plan Project of Yangzhou YZ2022203the Scientific Research Foundation of Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital SBJC21005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To find out the optimal treatment sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) for upper extremity dysfunction after stroke during the 6-week treatment and to explore its mechanism using motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI), 72 participants with upper extremity motor dysfunction after ischemic stroke were randomly divided into the control group, 10-session, 20-session, and 30-session rTMS groups. Low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS over the contralesional M1 was applied in all rTMS groups. The motor function of the upper extremity was assessed before and after treatment. In addition, MEPs and rs-fMRI data were analyzed to detect its effect on brain reorganization. After 6 weeks of treatment, there were significant differences in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity and the Wolf Motor Function Test scores between the 10-session group and the 30-session group and between the 20- and 30-session groups and the control group, while there was no significant difference between the 20-session group and the 30-session group. Meanwhile, no significant difference was found between the 10-session group and the control group. The 20-session group of rTMS decreased the excitability of the contralesional corticospinal tract represented by the amplitudes of MEPs and enhanced the functional connectivity of the ipsilesional M1 or premotor cortex with the the precentral gyrus, postcentral gyrus, and cingulate gyrus, etc. In conclusion, the 20-session of rTMS protocol is the optimal treatment sessions of TMS for upper extremity dysfunction after stroke during the 6-week treatment. The potential mechanism is related to its influence on the excitability of the corticospinal tract and the remodeling of corticomotor functional networks.

Indexed as

ischemic strokemagnetic resonance imagingmotor cortextranscranial magnetic stimulationupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID38137110
PMCPMC10741851
OpenAlexW4389182998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.