Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38137085›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2023

Advances in Intraoperative Glioma Tissue Sampling and Infiltration Assessment.

Nadeem N Al-Adli, Jacob S Young, Katie Scotford, Youssef E Sibih, Jessica Payne, Mitchel S Berger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadeem N Al-AdliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94131, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7803-8103
Jacob S YoungDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94131, USA.
Katie ScotfordDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94131, USA.
Youssef E SibihSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94131, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0839-5428
Jessica PayneDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94131, USA.
Mitchel S BergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94131, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USTexas Christian University · US

Funding

Training Program in Translational Brain Tumor ResearchT32CA151022 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Joseph F Costello · 2010 to 2026
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA151022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas are infiltrative brain tumors that often involve functional tissue. While maximal safe resection is critical for maximizing survival, this is challenged by the difficult intraoperative discrimination between tumor-infiltrated and normal structures. Surgical expertise is essential for identifying safe margins, and while the intraoperative pathological review of frozen tissue is possible, this is a time-consuming task. Advances in intraoperative stimulation mapping have aided surgeons in identifying functional structures and, as such, has become the gold standard for this purpose. However, intraoperative margin assessment lacks a similar consensus. Nonetheless, recent advances in intraoperative imaging techniques and tissue examination methods have demonstrated promise for the accurate and efficient assessment of tumor infiltration and margin delineation within the operating room, respectively. In this review, we describe these innovative technologies that neurosurgeons should be aware of.

Indexed as

advanced tissue samplingextent of resectiongliomaintraoperative imagingintraoperative marginstumor margins

Identifiers

PMID38137085
PMCPMC10741454
OpenAlexW4389056132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.