Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38137083›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

The Influence of Resistance Training Experience on the Efficacy of Motor Imagery for Acutely Increasing Corticospinal Excitability.

Emily J Parsowith, Matt S Stock, Ryan M Girts, Jonathan P Beausejour, Ariel Alberto, Joshua C Carr, Kylie K Harmon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily J ParsowithCognition, Neuroplasticity, Sarcopenia (CNS) Laboratory, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, School of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
Matt S StockCognition, Neuroplasticity, Sarcopenia (CNS) Laboratory, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, School of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1156-1084
Ryan M GirtsDepartment of Natural and Health Sciences, Pfeiffer University, Misenheimer, NC 28109, USA.
Jonathan P BeausejourCognition, Neuroplasticity, Sarcopenia (CNS) Laboratory, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, School of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
Ariel AlbertoSchool of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Joshua C CarrDepartment of Kinesiology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX 76109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0874-0110
Kylie K HarmonDepartment of Exercise Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both motor imagery and resistance-training enhance motor function and corticospinal excitability. We tested the hypothesis that young participants with significant resistance-training experience would show heightened corticospinal excitability during a single session of motor imagery training. Fifty-six participants (mean ± SD age = 22 ± 2 years) were divided into resistance-trained and untrained groups. Forty-one upper-body resistance trained (21 males, 20 females; mean ± SD relative one repetition maximum bench press = 0.922 ± 0.317 kg/kg) and 15 untrained (4 males, 11 females; mean ± SD relative one repetition maximum bench press = 0.566 ± 0.175 kg/kg) participants visited the laboratory on three separate occasions. The first visit served as the familiarization session. During visits 2 and 3, participants engaged in a hand/wrist motor imagery protocol or rested quietly (control condition) in a randomized order. Before and after the interventions, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the motor cortex was used to measure resting motor-evoked potential amplitude of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Our main finding was that motor imagery acutely increased corticospinal excitability by ~64% (marginal means pre = 784.1 µV, post = 1246.6 µV;

Indexed as

corticospinal excitabilityforceMEPmotor cortexmotor imagerymotor unitresistance–trainingstrengthTMStorque

Identifiers

PMID38137083
PMCPMC10742069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.