ReviewGenes2023
Navigating the Complex Landscape of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: From Current Paradigms to Therapeutic Frontiers.
Review in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetics of Zilurgisertib With and Without Food from Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Phase 1 Studies in Healthy Adults.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2025Trial
- Single-base 2'OMe-modified LNA and MOE gapmers selectively silenceMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Interdisciplinary Study of the Clinical Phenotype of Patients with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) in Dental Practice: A Cross-Sectional Clinical-Statistical Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: genetic and clinical characterization in a cohort of Polish patients and review of potential therapies.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Article
- Identifying global trends from case reports of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a scoping review.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review of Phase II and III Clinical Trials for the Pharmacological Treatment of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): Efficacy, Safety, and Challenges in Treatment Strategies.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- The role of miRNAs as biomarkers in heterotopic ossification.EFORT open reviews · 2024Review
- Proteomic Insights into Osteoporosis: Unraveling Diagnostic Markers of and Therapeutic Targets for the Metabolic Bone Disease.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Successful preimplantation genetic testing for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an enigmatic, ultra-rare genetic disorder characterized by progressive heterotopic ossification, wherein soft connective tissues undergo pathological transformation into bone structures. This incapacitating process severely limits patient mobility and poses formidable challenges for therapeutic intervention. Predominantly caused by missense mutations in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.