Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38136785›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Preselecting Variants from Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study Meta-Analyses Increases the Genomic Prediction Accuracy of Growth and Carcass Traits in Large White Pigs.

Chen Wei, Chengjie Chang, Wenjing Zhang, Duanyang Ren, Xiaodian Cai, Tianru Zhou, Shaolei Shi, Xibo Wu, Jinglei Si, Xiaolong Yuan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chen WeiNational Engineering Research Centre for Swine Breeding Industry, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5776-0500
Chengjie ChangNational Engineering Research Centre for Swine Breeding Industry, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Wenjing ZhangNational Engineering Research Centre for Swine Breeding Industry, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7492-7904
Duanyang RenNational Engineering Research Centre for Swine Breeding Industry, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7786-6748
Xiaodian CaiNational Engineering Research Centre for Swine Breeding Industry, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9924-8580
Tianru ZhouNational Engineering Research Centre for Swine Breeding Industry, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Shaolei ShiNational Engineering Research Centre for Swine Breeding Industry, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2639-7758
Xibo WuGuangxi State Farms Yongxin Animal Husbandry Group Co., Ltd., Nanning 530022, China.
Jinglei SiGuangxi State Farms Yongxin Animal Husbandry Group Co., Ltd., Nanning 530022, China.
Xiaolong YuanNational Engineering Research Centre for Swine Breeding Industry, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3743-0130
Jiaqi LiNational Engineering Research Centre for Swine Breeding Industry, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8308-9850
Zhe ZhangNational Engineering Research Centre for Swine Breeding Industry, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7338-7718
South China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32022078the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System CARS-35the Guangxi Science and Technology Program Project GuikeJB23023003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preselected variants associated with the trait of interest from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) are available to improve genomic prediction in pigs. The objectives of this study were to use preselected variants from a large GWAS meta-analysis to assess the impact of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) preselection strategies on genome prediction of growth and carcass traits in pigs. We genotyped 1018 Large White pigs using medium (50k) SNP arrays and then imputed SNPs to sequence level by utilizing a reference panel of 1602 whole-genome sequencing samples. We tested the effects of different proportions of selected top SNPs across different SNP preselection strategies on genomic prediction. Finally, we compared the prediction accuracies by employing genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), genomic feature BLUP and three weighted GBLUP models. SNP preselection strategies showed an average improvement in accuracy ranging from 0.3 to 2% in comparison to the SNP chip data. The accuracy of genomic prediction exhibited a pattern of initial increase followed by decrease, or continuous decrease across various SNP preselection strategies, as the proportion of selected top SNPs increased. The highest level of prediction accuracy was observed when utilizing 1 or 5% of top SNPs. Compared with the GBLUP model, the utilization of estimated marker effects from a GWAS meta-analysis as SNP weights in the BLUP|GA model improved the accuracy of genomic prediction in different SNP preselection strategies. The new SNP preselection strategies gained from this study bring opportunities for genomic prediction in limited-size populations in pigs.

Indexed as

genomic predictiongrowth and carcass traitslarge-scale genome-wide association studies meta-analysispigpreselected variants

Identifiers

PMID38136785
PMCPMC10740834
OpenAlexW4389340865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.