Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38136764›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Cefiderocol and Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant

Arta Karruli, Antonella Migliaccio, Spyros Pournaras, Emanuele Durante-Mangoni, Raffaele Zarrilli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sulbactam-durlobactam and cefiderocol combination treatment ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Review ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clonal lineage and biofilm growth shape cefiderocol activity inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Carbapenem-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Carbapenem Resistance inMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Arta KarruliDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Antonella MigliaccioDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Spyros PournarasClinical Microbiology Laboratory, Medical School, "Attikon" University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Street, 12462 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6298-9577
Emanuele Durante-MangoniDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5381-3537
Raffaele ZarrilliDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4191-9032
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) P2022YCH8R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant

Indexed as

antimicrobial susceptibilityantimicrobial therapycarbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanniicefiderocolmechanisms of resistancesulbactam-durlobactam

Identifiers

PMID38136764
PMCPMC10740486
OpenAlexW4389736711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.