ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Information from Noise: Measuring Dyslexia Risk Using Rasch-like Matrix Factorization with a Procedure for Equating Instruments.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the psychometric properties of a screening protocol for dyslexia and demonstrates a special form of matrix factorization called Nous based on the Alternating Least Squares algorithm. Dyslexia presents an intrinsically multidimensional complex of cognitive loads. By building and enforcing a common 6-dimensional space, Nous extracts a multidimensional signal for each person and item from test data that increases the Shannon entropy of the dataset while at the same time being constrained to meet the special objectivity requirements of the Rasch model. The resulting Dyslexia Risk Scale (DRS) yields linear equal-interval measures that are comparable regardless of the subset of items taken by the examinee. Each measure and cell estimate is accompanied by an efficiently calculated standard error. By incorporating examinee age into the calibration process, the DRS can be generalized to all age groups to allow the tracking of individual dyslexia risk over time. The methodology was implemented using a 2019 calibration sample of 828 persons aged 7 to 82 with varying degrees of dyslexia risk. The analysis yielded high reliability (0.95) and excellent receiver operating characteristics (AUC = 0.96). The analysis is accompanied by a discussion of the information-theoretic properties of matrix factorization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.