Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38136438›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Oncologic Outcome of Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer.

Atanas Ignatov, József Mészáros, Stylianos Ivros, Paolo Gennari, Tanja Ignatov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Atanas IgnatovDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9006-4029
József MészárosDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany.
Stylianos IvrosDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany.
Paolo GennariDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany.
Tanja IgnatovDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany.
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEMetropolitan Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been introduced in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer as an alternative to systematic lymph node dissection (LND). However, the survival impact of SLNB is not yet well characterised.

methodsWe performed a retrospective study of 419 patients with endometrial cancer treated with SLNB alone or with pelvic and para-aortic LND. For SLNB mapping, indocyanine green was used.

resultsMedian follow-up was 66 months. After exclusions, 337 patients were eligible for analysis. Of them, 150 underwent SLNB and 187 LND. During the follow-up time, 27 (24.7%) of the 150 who underwent SLNB and 54 (28.9%) of the 187 who underwent LND were diagnosed with recurrent disease (

conclusionOur data suggested that SLNB did not compromise the oncological outcome of patients with endometrial cancer compared to LND.

Indexed as

endometrial cancerlymph-node dissectionsentinel nodesurvival

Identifiers

PMID38136438
PMCPMC10741694
OpenAlexW4389917936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.