Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38136434›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Identifying Lymph Nodes and Their Statuses from Pretreatment Computer Tomography Images of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Using a Clinical-Data-Driven Deep Learning Algorithm.

Sheng-Yao Huang, Wen-Lin Hsu, Dai-Wei Liu, Edzer L Wu, Yu-Shao Peng, Zhe-Ting Liao, Ren-Jun Hsu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Repurposing niclosamide to mitigate inflammaging: a review of multi-target mechanisms in cellular senescence and age-related decline.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Artificial Intelligence Assurance in Head and Neck Surgery: Now and Next.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheng-Yao HuangInstitute of Medical Science, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970374, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2786-2298
Wen-Lin HsuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien 970473, Taiwan.
Dai-Wei LiuInstitute of Medical Science, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970374, Taiwan.
Edzer L WuDeepQ Technology Corp, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan.
Yu-Shao PengDeepQ Technology Corp, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan.
Zhe-Ting LiaoDeepQ Technology Corp, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan.
Ren-Jun HsuInstitute of Medical Science, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970374, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2877-9215
Tzu Chi University · TW

Funding

Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation TCMF-IMC 112-02Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation TCRD-110-15, IMAR-110-01-08, TCRD112-032, TCRD112-047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHead and neck cancer is highly prevalent in Taiwan. Its treatment mainly relies on clinical staging, usually diagnosed from images. A major part of the diagnosis is whether lymph nodes are involved in the tumor. We present an algorithm for analyzing clinical images that integrates a deep learning model with image processing and attempt to analyze the features it uses to classify lymph nodes.

methodsWe retrospectively collected pretreatment computed tomography images and surgery pathological reports for 271 patients diagnosed with, and subsequently treated for, naïve oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx cancer between 2008 and 2018. We chose a 3D UNet model trained for semantic segmentation, which was evaluated for inference in a test dataset of 29 patients.

resultsWe annotated 2527 lymph nodes. The detection rate of all lymph nodes was 80%, and Dice score was 0.71. The model has a better detection rate at larger lymph nodes. For those identified lymph nodes, we found a trend where the shorter the short axis, the more negative the lymph nodes. This is consistent with clinical observations.

conclusionsThe model showed a convincible lymph node detection on clinical images. We will evaluate and further improve the model in collaboration with clinical physicians.

Indexed as

computed tomographydeep learninghead and neck cancerimage processingsemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38136434
PMCPMC10741600
OpenAlexW4389921100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.