Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38136351›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

The Importance of Optimal Thermal Ablation Margins in Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 21 Studies.

David-Dimitris Chlorogiannis, Vlasios S Sotirchos, Christos Georgiades, Dimitrios Filippiadis, Ronald S Arellano, Mithat Gonen, Gregory C Makris, Tushar Garg, Constantinos T Sofocleous

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Interventional therapeutic strategies for metastatic liver cancer].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David-Dimitris ChlorogiannisDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1596-9466
Vlasios S SotirchosWeill-Cornell Medical College, Interventional Oncology/Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7278-1369
Christos GeorgiadesDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Dimitrios Filippiadis2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "Attikon", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Ronald S ArellanoDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Mithat GonenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Gregory C MakrisDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Tushar GargDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5964-6354
Constantinos T SofocleousWeill-Cornell Medical College, Interventional Oncology/Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3142-1399

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. Thermal ablation (TA) can be a comparable alternative to partial hepatectomy for selected cases when eradication of all visible tumor with an ablative margin of greater than 5 mm is achieved. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to encapsulate the current clinical evidence concerning the optimal TA margin for local cure in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, and the CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception until 1 May 2023, in accordance with the PRISMA Guidelines. Measure of effect included the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model.

resultsOverall, 21 studies were included, comprising 2005 participants and 2873 ablated CLMs. TA with margins less than 5 mm were associated with a 3.6 times higher risk for LTP (n = 21 studies, RR: 3.60; 95% CI: 2.58-5.03;

conclusionsThis meta-analysis solidifies that a minimal ablation margin over 5 mm is the minimum critical endpoint required, whereas a minimal margin of at least 10 mm yields optimal local tumor control after TA of CLMs.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerinterventional oncologyliver metastasesmarginsystematic reviewthermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID38136351
PMCPMC10741591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.