Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38136310›Full record

GuidelineCancers2023

Guidelines for the Use and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials.

Edward Laane, Sam Salek, Esther Natalie Oliva, Christine Bennink, Solène Clavreul, Paul G Richardson, Christof Scheid, Katja Weisel, Tatyana Ionova, European Hematology Association Specialized Working Group on Quality of Life and Symptoms

Open access · goldAbstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Edward LaaneHematology-Oncology Clinic, Tartu University, 50406 Tartu, Estonia.
Sam SalekSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4612-5699
Esther Natalie OlivaU.O.C. Ematologia, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, 89124 Reggio di Calabria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9238-5734
Christine BenninkDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8700-8598
Solène ClavreulMyeloma Patients Europe, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Paul G RichardsonJerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Christof ScheidDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany.
Katja WeiselDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Tatyana IonovaQuality of Life Unit, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital, 190103 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
European Hematology Association Specialized Working Group on Quality of Life and Symptoms
Azienda ospedaliera "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" · ITDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USErasmus MC · NLEuropean Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients Associations · BESt Petersburg University · RUTartu University Hospital · EEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of personalized medicine there is an increasing need for the assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to become a standard of patient care. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are important in assessing significant and meaningful changes as a result of an intervention based on a patient's own perspective. It is well established that active multiple myeloma (MM) can be characterized by a high burden of disease and treatment-related symptoms, with considerable worsening of quality of life (QoL). In general, and over the past decade, the focus has shifted to obtaining the most durable remissions with the best QoL as primary goals for MM treatment. Patients place considerable value on their QoL and communicating about QoL data prior to treatment decisions allows them to make informed treatment choices. Consequently, optimization of QoL of patients with MM is an important therapeutic goal and the incorporation of PROs into clinical trials has the potential of improving treatment outcomes. In this regard, guidance for the use and reporting of PROMs in MM in clinical trials is warranted. Under the auspices of the European Hematology Association, evidence-based guidelines for the use and reporting of PROs in patients with MM have been developed according to the EHA's core Guidelines Development Methodology. This document provides general considerations for the choice of PROMs in MM clinical trials as well as a series of recommendations covering a selection of PROMs in MM clinical trials; the mode of administration; timing of assessments; strategies to minimize missing data; sample size calculation; reporting of results; and interpretation of results.

Indexed as

clinical trialsguidelinemultiple myelomapatient-reported outcomesquality of lifesymptomssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38136310
PMCPMC10741926
OpenAlexW4389478568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.