Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38136292›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

The Impact of Outpatient versus Inpatient Administration of CAR-T Therapies on Clinical, Economic, and Humanistic Outcomes in Patients with Hematological Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.

Doris K Hansen, Yi-Hsuan Liu, Sandip Ranjan, Hitesh Bhandari, Ravi Potluri, Lindsay McFarland, Kevin C De Braganca, Stephen Huo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Quality of Life in CAR-T Cell Therapy.Hematology reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Doris K HansenH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9813-3578
Yi-Hsuan LiuJanssen Scientific Affairs, Horsham, PA 19044, USA.
Sandip RanjanPutnam Associates, Gurgaon 122002, India.
Hitesh BhandariPutnam Associates, Gurgaon 122002, India.
Ravi PotluriPutnam Associates, New York, NY 10282, USA.
Lindsay McFarlandLegend Biotech USA, Inc., Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Kevin C De BragancaJanssen Biotech, Horsham, PA 19044, USA.
Stephen HuoJanssen Scientific Affairs, Horsham, PA 19044, USA.
Janssen (United States) · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

CSRD VA 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies are typically administered in the inpatient setting, outpatient administration is rapidly expanding. However, there is limited summarized evidence comparing outcomes between outpatient and inpatient administration. This systematic literature review aims to compare the safety, efficacy, quality of life (QoL), costs, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) outcomes in patients with hematological cancer who are administered CAR-T therapy in an outpatient versus an inpatient setting. Publications (2016 or later) that reported the outcomes of interest in patients treated with a CAR-T therapy in both outpatient and inpatient settings, or only the outpatient setting, were reviewed. In total, 38 publications based on 21 studies were included. Safety findings suggested the comparable frequency of adverse events in the two settings. Eleven studies that reported data in both settings showed comparable response rates (80-82% in outpatient and 72-80% in inpatient). Improvements in the QoL were observed in both settings while costs associated with CAR-T therapy were lower in the outpatient setting. Although unplanned hospitalizations were higher in the outpatient cohort, overall HCRU was lower. Outpatient administration of CAR-T therapy appears to have comparable outcomes in safety, efficacy, and QoL to inpatient administration while reducing the economic burden.

Indexed as

CAR-Tcosteffectivenesshematological cancerslymphomamultiple myelomaoutpatient administrationoutpatient monitoringquality of lifesafety

Identifiers

PMID38136292
PMCPMC10741664
OpenAlexW4389432545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.