ArticleCancers2023
Complementary Role of CEUS and CT/MR LI-RADS for Diagnosis of Recurrent HCC.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Trial
- Nanovaccines with ferroptosis, necroptosis and STING-activation for synergistic immunotherapy.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Article
- Dual-modality imaging with CEUS and MRI for early recurrence assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma following combined radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- A reproducible ultrasound localization microscopy framework for the quantitative imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma on a clinical ultrasound system.Theranostics · 2026Article
- The impact of ultrasound contrast-enhanced fusion virtual navigation technology-guided microwave ablation (MWA) and standard MWA on the local tumor progression of hepatocellular carcinoma with unclear ultrasound images.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Radiomics for Predicting Response to MR-Guided Radiotherapy in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Nonradiation Treatment Response Assessment LI-RADS v2024 Using Data From a Multi-Center Transarterial Chemoembolization Study.Academic radiology · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe retrospectively compared the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computer tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter curative treatment with 421 ultrasound (US) detected lesions, 303 HCC patients underwent both CEUS and CT/MRI. Each lesion was assigned a Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category according to CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed to determine the optimal diagnosis algorithms for CEUS, CT and MRI. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between CEUS and CT/MRI.
resultsAmong the 421 lesions, 218 were diagnosed as recurrent HCC, whereas 203 lesions were diagnosed as benign. In recurrent HCC, CEUS detected more arterial hyperenhancement (APHE) and washout than CT and more APHE than MRI. CEUS yielded better diagnostic performance than CT (AUC: 0.981 vs. 0.958) (
conclusionCEUS demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance but an inferior detection rate for recurrent HCC. CEUS and CT/MRI played a complementary role in the detection and characterization of recurrent HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.