ReviewCancers2023
Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer: A Review.
Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenolic Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical Exposure and Systemic Biomarker Variability in Patients with Lung Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Review
- Cardiotoxicity of Targeted Therapies in Hematologic Malignancies: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Management.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- A bibliometric analysis of lung cancer and atrial fibrillation [1991-2026]: research hotspots, thematic evolution, and translational landscape in cardio-oncology.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Do Cancer Patients Present a Different Phenotype of Atrial Fibrillation or a Different Arrhythmia Management?Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Rising burden of cancer and atrial fibrillation-related mortality among adults in the United States, 1999-2019.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Comparison of proton and photon therapy in stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular tachycardia.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Repeated stereotactic radioablation for recurrent ventricular tachycardia in a patient with lung cancer.Cardiology journal · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardio-oncology currently faces one of the greatest challenges in the field of health care. The main goal of this discipline is to ensure that patients treated for cancer do not suffer or die from cardiovascular disease. The number of studies on the mechanisms of heart injury during cancer treatment is constantly increasing. However, there is insufficient data on heart rhythm disorders that may result from this treatment. This issue seems to be particularly important in patients with lung cancer, in whom anticancer therapy, especially radiotherapy, may contribute to the onset of cardiac arrhythmias. The observed relationship between cardiac dosimetry and radiotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in lung cancer treatment may explain the increased mortality from cardiovascular causes in patients after chest irradiation. Further research is essential to elucidate the role of cardiac arrhythmias in this context. Conversely, recent reports have highlighted the application of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. This review of available studies on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of arrhythmias in patients treated for lung cancer aims to draw attention to the need for regular cardiological monitoring in this group of patients. Improving cardiac care for patients with lung cancer has the potential to enhance their overall therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.