Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38136124›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Quality of Care in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.

Tania Ruiz-Gil, Francisco Ródenas-Rigla

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tania Ruiz-GilPolibienestar Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0009-0004-2255-2735
Francisco Ródenas-RiglaPolibienestar Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3264-4735

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2019-110997RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Palliative care (PC) enhances the quality of life for patients and families facing life-threatening conditions. While PC is well-established for adults, not all practices apply to pediatrics. Consequently, specific quality indicators for Pediatric Palliative Care (PPC) must be identified. This scoping review aimed to identify the variables associated with the quality of care of PPC patients in Spain, focusing specifically on three areas: structure and process of care, psychological aspects of care, and care of patients approaching the end of life. The review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, and Dialnet databases covering the period extending from January 2000 to May 2023. Finally, 35 studies were identified for the complete review. A total of 30 studies include variables associated with the structure and process of care, 20 include variables associated with psychological aspects of care, and 23 studies integrate variables related to patient care at the end of life. Analysis suggests that enhancing professional training in aspects such as communication with patients and families, creating intimate spaces with flexible visiting hours, increasing emotional support, promoting frequent contact with healthcare teams, and transparently communicating about illness and imminent death to both families and minors could improve the quality of PPC.

Indexed as

pediatric palliative carequality of carescoping reviewSpain

Identifiers

PMID38136124
PMCPMC10741525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.