Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38136084›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Current Status and Future Application.

Ludmilla Bazin, Alexandre Ansorge, Tanguy Vendeuvre, Blaise Cochard, Anne Tabard-Fougère, Oscar Vazquez, Giacomo De Marco, Vishal Sarwahi, Romain Dayer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ludmilla BazinDivision of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Alexandre AnsorgeDepartment of Spine Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3155-0286
Tanguy VendeuvreDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Blaise CochardDivision of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3330-935X
Anne Tabard-FougèreDivision of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2231-1048
Oscar VazquezDivision of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1325-8575
Giacomo De MarcoDivision of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Vishal SarwahiDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York, NY 11040, USA.
Romain DayerDivision of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Geneva · CHNorthwell Health · USUniversité de Poitiers · FRUniversity of Lucerne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The posterior minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) approach-or the paraspinal muscle approach-for posterior spinal fusion and segmental instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was first reported in 2011. It is less invasive than the traditionally used open posterior midline approach, which is associated with significant morbidity, including denervation of the paraspinal muscles, significant blood loss, and a large midline skin incision. The literature suggests that the MISS approach, though technically challenging and with a longer operative time, provides similar levels of deformity correction, lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, better pain outcomes, and a faster return to sports than the open posterior midline approach. Correction maintenance and fusion rates also seem to be equivalent for both approaches. This narrative review presents the results of relevant publications reporting on spinal segmental instrumentation using pedicle screws and posterior spinal fusion as part of an MISS approach. It then compares them with the results of the traditional open posterior midline approach for treating AIS. It specifically examines perioperative morbidity and radiological and clinical outcomes with a minimal follow-up length of 2 years (range 2-9 years).

Indexed as

adolescent idiopathic scoliosiscorrectionparaspinal muscle approachposterior instrumentation and fusion

Identifiers

PMID38136084
PMCPMC10742062
OpenAlexW4389245770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.