Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38136024›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Combined Edge Loss UNet for Optimized Segmentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Preoperative Planning.

Luca Marsilio, Andrea Moglia, Matteo Rossi, Alfonso Manzotti, Luca Mainardi, Pietro Cerveri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Is orthopaedics entering the age of generative AI?-A narrative review of current applications challenges and future directions.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Automation in tibial implant loosening detection using deep-learning segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luca MarsilioDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-9738-0438
Andrea MogliaDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3365-580X
Matteo RossiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2519-0720
Alfonso ManzottiHospital ASST FBF-Sacco, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1791-6800
Luca MainardiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6276-6314
Pietro CerveriDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3995-8673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone segmentation and 3D reconstruction are crucial for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgical planning with Personalized Surgical Instruments (PSIs). Traditional semi-automatic approaches are time-consuming and operator-dependent, although they provide reliable outcomes. Moreover, the recent expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) tools towards various medical domains is transforming modern healthcare. Accordingly, this study introduces an automated AI-based pipeline to replace the current operator-based tibia and femur 3D reconstruction procedure enhancing TKA preoperative planning. Leveraging an 822 CT image dataset, a novel patch-based method and an improved segmentation label generation algorithm were coupled to a Combined Edge Loss UNet (CEL-UNet), a novel CNN architecture featuring an additional decoding branch to boost the bone boundary segmentation. Root Mean Squared Errors and Hausdorff distances compared the predicted surfaces to the reference bones showing median and interquartile values of 0.26 (0.19-0.36) mm and 0.24 (0.18-0.32) mm, and of 1.06 (0.73-2.15) mm and 1.43 (0.82-2.86) mm for the tibia and femur, respectively, outperforming previous results of our group, state-of-the-art, and UNet models. A feasibility analysis for a PSI-based surgical plan revealed sub-millimetric distance errors and sub-angular alignment uncertainties in the PSI contact areas and the two cutting planes. Finally, operational environment testing underscored the pipeline's efficiency. More than half of the processed cases complied with the PSI prototyping requirements, reducing the overall time from 35 min to 13.1 s, while the remaining ones underwent a manual refinement step to achieve such PSI requirements, performing the procedure four to eleven times faster than the manufacturer standards. To conclude, this research advocates the need for real-world applicability and optimization of AI solutions in orthopedic surgical practice.

Indexed as

3D bone reconstructionartificial intelligenceautomatic segmentationclinical translationCT segmentationorthopedic surgerypreoperative planningtotal knee arthroplastyUNet

Identifiers

PMID38136024
PMCPMC10740423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.