Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38135967›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Biomaterials for Alveolar Ridge Preservation as a Preoperative Procedure for Implant Treatment: History and Current Evidence.

Tetsuya Sano, Ryutaro Kuraji, Yukihiro Miyashita, Kosei Yano, Dai Kawanabe, Yukihiro Numabe

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tetsuya SanoDepartment of Periodontology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, 1-9-20, Fujimi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 1020071, Japan.ORCID 0009-0000-8814-7477
Ryutaro KurajiDepartment of Periodontology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, 1-9-20, Fujimi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 1020071, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7900-3604
Yukihiro MiyashitaDepartment of Periodontology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, 1-9-20, Fujimi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 1020071, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7628-7237
Kosei YanoLotus Dental Clinic, 3-13-11, Nishigotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 1410031, Japan.
Dai KawanabeKawanabe Dental Clinic, T Building 1F, 4-21-4, Nishikojiya, Ota-ku, Tokyo 1440034, Japan.
Yukihiro NumabeDepartment of Periodontology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, 1-9-20, Fujimi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 1020071, Japan.
Nippon Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In implant treatment, the reduction and structural changes in the alveolar ridge that occur after tooth extraction limit the length, width, and placement position of the implant body, impair esthetics, and, in some cases, make implant placement difficult. To solve these problems, an alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) technique, which is performed simultaneously with tooth extraction, generally aims to promote bone regeneration and prevent alveolar ridge reduction by filling the extraction socket with bone graft material and then covering it with a barrier membrane to protect against the invasion of epithelial tissue. The extraction socket provides a favorable environment for bone regeneration throughout the healing period because the blood supply is abundant, and it effectively retains the bone graft material by using the remaining bone wall of the socket. In recent years, advances in bioengineering technology have led to the development of graft materials with various biological properties, but there is currently no clear consensus regarding the selection of surgical techniques and materials depending on the condition of the alveolar ridge. This review will provide a comprehensive survey of the evidence accumulated to date on ARP, present many cases according to the clinical situation, and discuss various treatment options.

Indexed as

absorbable alternative materialsbone grafting materialsimmediate implant placementopen membrane techniquesoft tissue graftingwound healing

Identifiers

PMID38135967
PMCPMC10740455
OpenAlexW4389201026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.