ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Diagnostic Accuracy and Performance Analysis of a Scanner-Integrated Artificial Intelligence Model for the Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhages in a Traumatology Emergency Department.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world performance and misclassification patterns of deep learning for intracranial hemorrhage detection.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- AI enhanced surgeons' faster responses to intraoperative bleeding in laparoscopic surgery: a preclinical randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence for Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection on Emergency Brain CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance and confidence of an optimized deep-learning algorithm for the detection of intracranial hemorrhages.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Real-World Integration of an Automated Tool for Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection in an Unselected Cohort of Emergency Department Patients-An External Validation Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sentiment Analysis of Radiological Narratives and Intracranial MRI Hemorrhage Images for the Prediction of Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Standalone AI Versus AI-Assisted Radiologists in Emergency ICH Detection: A Prospective, Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning for Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection in Non-Contrast Brain CT Scans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- An Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Integrated into the Clinical Workflow Can Ensure High Quality Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage CT Diagnostic.Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Potential strength and weakness of artificial intelligence integration in emergency radiology: a review of diagnostic utilizations and applications in patient care optimization.Emergency radiology · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial hemorrhages require an immediate diagnosis to optimize patient management and outcomes, and CT is the modality of choice in the emergency setting. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the first scanner-integrated artificial intelligence algorithm to detect brain hemorrhages in a routine clinical setting. This retrospective study includes 435 consecutive non-contrast head CT scans. Automatic brain hemorrhage detection was calculated as a separate reconstruction job in all cases. The radiological report (RR) was always conducted by a radiology resident and finalized by a senior radiologist. Additionally, a team of two radiologists reviewed the datasets retrospectively, taking additional information like the clinical record, course, and final diagnosis into account. This consensus reading served as a reference. Statistics were carried out for diagnostic accuracy. Brain hemorrhage detection was executed successfully in 432/435 (99%) of patient cases. The AI algorithm and reference standard were consistent in 392 (90.7%) cases. One false-negative case was identified within the 52 positive cases. However, 39 positive detections turned out to be false positives. The diagnostic performance was calculated as a sensitivity of 98.1%, specificity of 89.7%, positive predictive value of 56.7%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.7%. The execution of scanner-integrated AI detection of brain hemorrhages is feasible and robust. The diagnostic accuracy has a high specificity and a very high negative predictive value and sensitivity. However, many false-positive findings resulted in a relatively moderate positive predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.