ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Utilizing Deep Learning Algorithms for Signal Processing in Electrochemical Biosensors: From Data Augmentation to Detection and Quantification of Chemicals of Interest.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diffusion Model-Based Multi-Channel EEG Representation and Forecasting for Early Epileptic Seizure Warning.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Molecular Biosensors: Design Strategies for Wearable and Real-Time Monitoring.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based battery health prediction for enhancing electric vehicle performance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From Drops to Decisions: AI/ML-Driven Biofluidics for Clinical Diagnostics and Healthcare Intelligence.Analytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Nanosensors for Clinical Diagnostics: Current Advances and Future Prospects.Biosensors · 2025Review
- AI-Enhanced Electrochemical Sensing Systems: A Paradigm Shift for Intelligent Food Safety Monitoring.Biosensors · 2025Review
- An explainable deep learning framework for biosensing data interpretation in biomedical engineering and real-time health diagnostics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanomaterial-based aptasensors serve as useful instruments for detecting small biological entities. This work utilizes data gathered from three electrochemical aptamer-based sensors varying in receptors, analytes of interest, and lengths of signals. Our ultimate objective was the automatic detection and quantification of target analytes from a segment of the signal recorded by these sensors. Initially, we proposed a data augmentation method using conditional variational autoencoders to address data scarcity. Secondly, we employed recurrent-based networks for signal extrapolation, ensuring uniform signal lengths. In the third step, we developed seven deep learning classification models (GRU, unidirectional LSTM (ULSTM), bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM), ConvGRU, ConvULSTM, ConvBLSTM, and CNN) to identify and quantify specific analyte concentrations for six distinct classes, ranging from the absence of analyte to 10 μM. Finally, the second classification model was created to distinguish between abnormal and normal data segments, detect the presence or absence of analytes in the sample, and, if detected, identify the specific analyte and quantify its concentration. Evaluating the time series forecasting showed that the GRU-based network outperformed two other ULSTM and BLSTM networks. Regarding classification models, it turned out signal extrapolation was not effective in improving the classification performance. Comparing the role of the network architectures in classification performance, the result showed that hybrid networks, including both convolutional and recurrent layers and CNN networks, achieved 82% to 99% accuracy across all three datasets. Utilizing short-term Fourier transform (STFT) as the preprocessing technique improved the performance of all datasets with accuracies from 84% to 99%. These findings underscore the effectiveness of suitable data preprocessing methods in enhancing neural network performance, enabling automatic analyte identification and quantification from electrochemical aptasensor signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.