Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38135769›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2024

Comparative study of machine learning methods for modeling associations between risk factors and future dementia cases.

Vaka Valsdóttir, María K Jónsdóttir, Brynja Björk Magnúsdóttir, Milan Chang, Yi-Han Hu, Vilmundur Gudnason, Lenore J Launer, Hlynur Stefánsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vaka ValsdóttirDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland. vaka@ru.is.ORCID 0000-0003-3642-6313
María K JónsdóttirDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0003-0383-007X
Brynja Björk MagnúsdóttirDepartment of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-6131-7269
Milan ChangRHLÖ - Icelandic Gerontological Research Center, Landspítali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-3556-3810
Yi-Han HuLaboratory of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, National Institute On Aging, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0882-6563
Vilmundur GudnasonFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-0084
Lenore J LaunerLaboratory of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, National Institute On Aging, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3238-7612
Hlynur StefánssonDepartment of Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-8074

Funding

Age, Gene/environment Susceptibility Study In Iceland - Ocular ComponentZIAEY000401 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI COTCH, MARY FRANCES · 2009 to 2020
$3.3M
Brain aging and cardiovascular risk factors and diseaseZIAAG007480 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI LAUNER, LENORE J · 2011 to 2025
$2.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA EY000401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial portion of dementia risk can be attributed to modifiable risk factors that can be affected by lifestyle changes. Identifying the contributors to dementia risk could prove valuable. Recently, machine learning methods have been increasingly applied to healthcare data. Several studies have attempted to predict dementia progression by using such techniques. This study aimed to compare the performance of different machine-learning methods in modeling associations between known cognitive risk factors and future dementia cases. A subset of the AGES-Reykjavik Study dataset was analyzed using three machine-learning methods: logistic regression, random forest, and neural networks. Data were collected twice, approximately five years apart. The dataset included information from 1,491 older adults who underwent a cognitive screening process and were considered to have healthy cognition at baseline. Cognitive risk factors included in the models were based on demographics, MRI data, and other health-related data. At follow-up, participants were re-evaluated for dementia using the same cognitive screening process. Various performance metrics for all three machine learning algorithms were assessed. The study results indicate that a random forest algorithm performed better than neural networks and logistic regression in predicting the association between cognitive risk factors and dementia. Compared to more traditional statistical analyses, machine-learning methods have the potential to provide more accurate predictions about which individuals are more likely to develop dementia than others.

Indexed as

DementiaAgedCognitionHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningRisk FactorsAGES-Reykjavik StudyCognitive agingCognitive risk factorsMachine learningModel performanceRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID38135769
PMCPMC10828447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.