Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38135742›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Prediction and characterization of prophages of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia reveals a remarkable phylogenetic diversity of prophages.

Zheng Fang, Man Xu, Shan Shen, Weiwei Sun, Qing Yu, Qingshan Wu, Lan Xiang, Qingbei Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterization and genomic analysis of a lyticFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zheng Fang *School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.
Man Xu *School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.
Shan ShenSchool of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.
Weiwei SunSchool of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.
Qing YuSchool of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.
Qingshan WuSchool of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.
Lan XiangQiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun, 558000, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.
Qingbei WengSchool of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, People's Republic of China. wengqb@126.com.

Funding

Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Karst Science Research Center of Guizhou Province U1812401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prophages, which enables bacterial hosts to acquire novel traits, and increase genetic variation and evolutionary innovation, are considered to be one of the greatest drivers of bacterial diversity and evolution. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is widely distributed and one of the most important multidrug resistant bacteria in hospitals. However, the distribution and genetic diversity of S. maltophilia prophages have not been elucidated. In this study, putative prophages were predicted in S. maltophilia genomes by using virus prediction tools, and the genetic diversity and phylogeny of S. maltophilia and the prophages they harbor were further analyzed. A total of 356 prophage regions were predicted from 88 S. maltophilia genomes. Among them, 144 were intact prophages, but 77.09% of the intact prophages did not match any known phage sequences in the public database. The number of prophage carried by S. maltophilia is related to its host habitat and is an important factor affecting the size of the host genome, but it is not related to the genetic diversity of the prophage. The prediction of auxiliary genes encoded by prophage showed that antibiotic resistance genes was not predicted for any of the prophages except for one questionable prophage, while 53 virulence genes and 169 carbohydrate active enzymes were predicted from 11.24 and 44.1% prophages, respectively. Most of the prophages (72.29%) mediated horizontal gene transfer of S. maltophilia genome, but only involved in 6.25% of the horizontal gene transfer events. In addition, CRISPR prediction indicated 97.75% S. maltophilia strains contained the CRISPR-Cas system containing 818 spacer sequences. However, these spacer sequences did not match any known S. maltophilia phages, and only a few S. maltophilia prophages. Comparative genomic analysis revealed a highly conserved and syntenic organization with genomic rearrangement between the prophages and the known related S. maltophilia phages. Our results indicate a high prevalence and genetic diversity of prophages in the genome of S. maltophilia, as well as the presence of a large number of uncharacterized phages. It provides an important complement to understanding the diversity and biological characteristics of phages, as well as the interactions and evolution between bacteria and phages.

Indexed as

ProphagesStenotrophomonas maltophiliaGene Transfer, HorizontalGenomicsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID38135742
PMCPMC10746704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.